Canadian Wildlife

Wild Things

During the Second World War, a renowned US psychologi­st proposed training pigeons to target bombs. It was a workable idea … but it never flew

- By Jay Ingram

During the Second World War, renowned U.S. psychologi­st B.F. Skinner proposed training pigeons to target bombs. It was a workable idea… if grotesque

Psychologi­st B.F. Skinner dominated psychology in America for much of the 20th century with his work on behaviouri­sm, a view that shunned trying to understand what goes on in the brain to generate behaviour, instead concentrat­ing on the observable, the connection­s between behaviours and their consequenc­es. Positive and negative reinforcem­ent are essential components of this approach. Although today psychology has largely moved beyond many of Skinner’s ideas, there’s no doubt that he was one of the era’s outstandin­g psychologi­sts.

Animals like rats and pigeons were instrument­al in demonstrat­ing his ideas of reinforcem­ent: if a rat pressed a lever and obtained a food pellet in return, it would press the lever again. Skinner called that positive reinforcem­ent. If, instead, pressing the lever delivered something unpleasant, like an electric shock, that was negative reinforcem­ent. Pigeons were Skinner’s choice for one of the most bizarre ideas to emerge from the psychology lab.

One day during World War II, Skinner was sitting on a train, thinking about how to build a device that would guide missiles to targets more precisely. As he pondered, a flock of birds wheeled in the sky above him, and he was suddenly struck by the thought that birds, with their manoeuvera­bility and colour vision, could be used as bombsights. Obviously this was no ordinary thought to have while commuting. However, Skinner had had a great deal of experience guiding and controllin­g pigeons from his lab work, and thus was born Project Pigeon.

He had no trouble devising a suitable if somewhat DIY system. He could fit a pigeon’s head and neck through a hole cut out of the big toe of a man’s sock, lightly tie its wings together with a shoelace and strap it to a piece of wood. Then he trained the pigeon to keep its head pointing at a target and pecking as the target moved, always ensuring that successful tracking earned the pigeon a reward of seeds. The next step was to add electronic­s to the system so that when the target moved to one side, and the pigeon stepped up its pecking to follow it, the guidance system was activated to re-centre the target. Soon his birds were nearly perfect at keeping the target in the crosshairs.

The American military was at first uninterest­ed (no real surprise). But Skinner persisted, gradually upgrading the system, and slowly their interest was piqued. In fact, it was the military that eventually dubbed it Project Pigeon.

It worked like this: the force of the pigeon’s peck was mechanical­ly translated into opening one of a set of valves located on each side of the target screen. The valves in turn increased the air pressure in a system connected to the fins on the bomb. Peck, and a fin adjusted to redirect the bomb to its target. Pigeons may not be the brainiest of birds, but they soon figured out that they’d get a grain reward even if they didn’t hit the target exactly, and Skinner was forced to respond by redesignin­g a system with two intersecti­ng light beams crossing in front of the target. The bird then had to peck directly at the target to interrupt both light beams and get any grain.

Skinner trained a team of 64 pigeons. No matter what was thrown at them — nearby pistol noises, atmosphere­s equivalent to 10,000 feet, bright lights, high G-forces — it didn’t matter; they just kept pecking at the target. Male pigeons weren’t even distracted by being strapped in next to females. When fully trained, a pigeon could peck at the target four times a second for two full minutes.

Finally, in 1944, after hemming and hawing over Project Pigeon for years, the military decided not to explore further the use of pigeons as bombsights, citing other, more pressing technologi­cal needs. (Animal rights were apparently not a factor in the decision.) Although the project was briefly revived in the 1950s as Project Orcon (for “organic control”), in the end electronic guidance systems won out.

Skinner was disappoint­ed but chose to keep his pigeons to see whether they would gradually lose their targeting skills. Even six years later, they still performed to perfection. Perhaps it’s just as well the project never took flight. Because if it had been adopted, even a team of 64 pigeons wouldn’t have lasted long. After all, they would have been riding their missiles to the final impact.a

SKINNER WAS STRUCK BY THE THOUGHT THAT BIRDS, WITH THEIR MANOEUVRAB­ILITY AND COLOUR VISION, COULD BE USED AS BOMBSIGHTS

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada