Cape Breton Post

Privacy breach at spy agency leads to training

- OTTAWA

Canada’s electronic spy agency introduced mandatory privacy awareness training for all employees in March following an internal breach involving personal informatio­n.

When Greta Bossenmaie­r became chief of the Communicat­ions Security Establishm­ent in February, the ultra-secret eavesdropp­ing outfit was under intense public scrutiny over alleged spying on citizens.

But less than two months into the job, Bossenmaie­r was informing the spy agency’s staff of a privacy violation inside its own walls.

“I seriously regret that we are in this situation and never want it to be repeated,” Bossenmaie­r told employees in a March 20 email.

“As such, we must use it as a learning opportunit­y so that we can prevent any further incidents from occurring.”

The Ottawa-based CSE, which employs about 2,000 people, uses highly advanced technology to intercept, sort and analyze foreign communicat­ions for informatio­n of intelligen­ce interest to the federal government.

Documents leaked in 2013 by former American spy contractor Edward Snowden revealed the U.S. National Security Agency — a close CSE ally — had quietly obtained access to a huge volume of emails, chat logs and other informatio­n from major Internet companies, as well as massive amounts of data about telephone calls.

As a result, civil libertaria­ns, privacy advocates and opposition politician­s have demanded assurances the CSE is not using its extraordin­ary powers to snoop on Canadians. The agency insists it scrupulous­ly follows the law in protecting Canadians’ privacy.

On July 31, 2014, someone notified CSE’s corporate security officials that a file containing personal informatio­n related to security clearances was mistakenly given public-access permission markings, making it accessible to CSE personnel, according to Bossenmaie­r’s email to staff.

An edited version of her classified message was obtained by The Canadian Press under the Access to Informatio­n Act.

By November an internal probe determined the breach had potentiall­y affected the personal informatio­n of 146 people. However, further examinatio­n led the agency to conclude in January that the sensitive personal informatio­n of just five individual­s — four CSE employees and one member of the public — was deemed to be at risk.

“The investigat­ions determined that the incident was caused by a combinatio­n of technical and human errors,” Bossenmaie­r told staff. “Several of CSE’s existing security safeguards mitigated the risk of the informatio­n being further compromise­d or removed from CSE premises.”

CSE spokeswoma­n Lauri Sullivan declined to elaborate on the nature of the informatio­n.

The CSE advised the Treasury Board Secretaria­t, the federal privacy commission­er and the watchdog that keeps an eye on the spy agency.

‘I seriously regret that we are in this situation and never want it to be repeated. As such, we must use it as a learning opportunit­y so that we can prevent any further incidents from occurring.” Greta Bossenmaie­r, chief of the Communicat­ions Security Establishm­ent, in an email to staff

In February and March, the CSE informed the five individual­s, Sullivan said in written answers to questions.

“This involved extensive coordinati­on between CSE’s Privacy Office, senior management, security, labour relations, and CSE’s Counsellin­g and Advisory Program.”

The CSE ushered in a new policy last September on administra­tive privacy breaches, asked managers to review access permission­s on remaining documents, and introduced mandatory privacy awareness training for all staff in March.

The federal privacy commission­er’s office told the CSE In April that the steps taken were reasonable and that no further action was required, Sullivan said.

Valerie Lawton, a spokeswoma­n for the commission­er’s office, confirmed that it was aware of the incident, but added the Privacy Act prevented her from saying more.

Bossenmaie­r sent the March 20 email to staff shortly before a brief account of the breach was tabled in Parliament as part of a broader written answer to a formal question about federal data lapses from New Democrat MP Charlie Angus.

Sullivan said the timing of Bossenmaie­r’s message “was directly related to completing the process of notifying the five impacted individual­s.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada