Cape Breton Post

A look at what got done at NFL meetings

- BY BARRY WILNER

NFL owners got plenty done in their meetings, including approving the Raiders’ relocation from Oakland to Las Vegas, and addressing a variety of rules changes.

So what does it all mean?

VIVA LAS VEGAS

The Raiders’ move to America’s gambling capital was a slam dunk once Bank of America came aboard with a $650 million loan that followed Nevada putting up $750 million in public funding for a $1.7 billion stadium. Oakland never really had a plan that enticed Raiders owner Mark Davis nor other NFL team bosses.

This relocation is unlike the Rams moving to Los Angeles, then the Chargers following them there; yes, three teams switching homes in about one year’s time.

This is the NFL following much of America — at least the part that is enamoured of sports — in changing its perception of Sin City, the gambling capital of this nation.

Commission­er Roger Goodell said as much this week.

“I would probably tell you that I think society has probably had a little bit of a change

with respect to gambling in general,” Goodell said.

“I think we still strongly oppose it in that room, and otherwise, legalized sports gambling. The integrity of our game is No. 1. We will not compromise on that.

“But I also believe that Las Vegas is not the same city it was 10 years ago or 20 years ago. It’s a much more diverse city. It has become an entertainm­ent mecca. It’s the fastest-growing city in the country.”

DON’T LEAP

While SportsCent­er fell in

love with defenders on field goals or extra-point attempts jumping over the line to block those kicks, most players in the NFL were loathing it.

Too dangerous. Wisely, the league’s powerful competitio­n committee felt the same way.

“We all knew during the season at some point it was going to get discussed,” said competitio­n committee chairman Rich McKay, president of the Atlanta Falcons.

“We saw many instances as teams began to learn how to block it, it became more concerning ... all of a sudden the players weren’t getting a free run and now the player was (blocked and) coming down at a really bad angle.

“When we met with the players’ associatio­n, to a person they were quick to say, ‘We don’t like this play.’ We also get feedback on proposals, and that was one that they universall­y said, ‘We want that play taken out.”’

It’s out.

CENTRALIZE­D VIDEO

REVIEWS

This is not as major a step as some might think. Yes, the referee no longer will make the final decision, which will come from officiatin­g chief Dean Blandino and his staff in New York. He will have input, but it makes sense for the crew at NFL headquarte­rs to be the ultimate arbiter.

There is one person monitoring every game, and supervisor­s and overseers in the room.

They have the opportunit­y to view replays even before the referee gets involved. They also are removed from the scene, if you will, bringing a more measured approach to the review. No cacophony from the stands. No players screaming their approval or disapprova­l. No coaches throwing fits.

 ?? AP PHOTO ?? In this March 2014 file photo, Atlanta Falcons President, CEO and NFL competitio­n committee member Rich McKay speaks about rule changes during a news conference at the NFL football annual meeting in Orlando, Fla.
AP PHOTO In this March 2014 file photo, Atlanta Falcons President, CEO and NFL competitio­n committee member Rich McKay speaks about rule changes during a news conference at the NFL football annual meeting in Orlando, Fla.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada