Cape Breton Post

Reduced rights for travellers

Airline passenger rights bill claws back protection­s: advocate

- BY BRETT BUNDALE

Proposed federal legislatio­n that will lay the groundwork for an airline passenger bill of rights could claw back existing protection­s for air travellers, an airline passenger rights advocate says.

Gabor Lukacs said the Liberal government’s Bill C-49, the Transporta­tion Modernizat­ion Act, would double tarmac delays and scrap compensati­on requiremen­ts for flights affected by mechanical failures.

“What the government has billed as an air passenger bill of rights makes things substantia­lly worse for Canadians,” he said in an interview Saturday.

“It increases the time passengers are allowed to be kept on the tarmac without food or water from the current 90 minutes to three hours, and it dissolves responsibi­lity from delays resulting from their own maintenanc­e issues.”

A spokeswoma­n for Transporta­tion Minister Marc Garneau said rather than spell out an air passenger bill of rights in the legislatio­n, it instead directs the Canadian Transporta­tion Agency to develop regulation­s that would give air passengers more rights.

“Air passenger rights would be clear, consistent, transparen­t and fair for passengers and air carriers,” Delphine Denis said in an email Saturday. “A more predictabl­e and reasonable approach would benefit Canadian travellers.”

She said the new rules would establish clear standards of treatment — and financial compensati­on in some cases — for air travellers in common situations, including overbookin­g, seating children near a parent or guardian at no extra cost, and standards for transporti­ng musical instrument­s.

As for tarmac delays, Denis said there are “no regulation­s currently in place in Canada.”

“Certain air carriers have specified their own rules within their tariff,” she said. “A new approach would introduce regulation­s that would consistent­ly apply to all air carriers ... when a tarmac delay exceeds three hours.”

Denis added that airlines could always opt for a shorter tarmacdela­y rule.

But Lukacs called the suggestion that there are no rules in place for tarmac delays “troubling.”

He pointed to the Canadian Transporta­tion Agency’s ruling that Air Transat broke its agreement with passengers last summer during a sweltering, hours-long ordeal aboard two of its grounded aircraft.

The airline was fined $295,000 and ordered to cover out-ofpocket expenses for affected passengers on two flights that sat on the tarmac in Ottawa for almost five and six hours, respective­ly, with passengers not allowed to disembark.

“The government is taking away rights and trying to present existing rights as if they’re something new,” Lukacs said. “Now we’re supposed to wait for the Canadian Transporta­tion Agency to add protection­s.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada