Cape Breton Post

White House faces deadline to reunite migrants

-

The clock is ticking for the Trump administra­tion after a federal judge ordered thousands of migrant children and parents who were forcibly separated at the Mexican border reunited within 30 days, sooner for youngsters under 5.

The deadline was set Tuesday night by U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw in San Diego after President Donald Trump’s order ending his policy of separating families gave way to days of uncertaint­y, conflictin­g informatio­n and no word from the administra­tion on when parents might see their children again.

“This situation has reached a crisis level,’’ Sabraw wrote.

The ruling poses a host of logistical problems for the administra­tion, and it was unclear how it would meet the deadline.

Health and Human Services, which is in charge of the children, referred questions to the Justice Department.

The Justice Department said the ruling makes it “even more imperative that Congress finally act to give federal law enforcemen­t the ability to simultaneo­usly enforce the law and keep families together.’’

“Without this action by Congress, lawlessnes­s at the border will continue,’’ the department said.

Sabraw, an appointee of Republican President George W. Bush, said children under 5 must reunited with their parents within 14 days.

He also issued a nationwide injunction against further

family separation­s, unless the parent is deemed unfit or doesn’t want to be with the child, and ordered the government to provide phone contact between parents and their children within 10 days.

The case was brought by the American Civil Liberties Union, which sued in March on behalf of a 7-year-old girl who was separated from her Congolese mother and a 14-year-old boy who was taken from his Brazilian mother.

“Tears will be flowing in detention centres across the country when the families learn they will be reunited,’’ said ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt.

As for whether the deadline is realistic, ACLU Executive

Director Anthony Romero said: “Matching up 2,000 kids, which is probably fewer than the number of entrants into JFK on a very busy day, should not be a problem for the U.S. federal government if it chooses to make it a priority.’’

“It’s a question of political will, not resources,’’ he said.

More than 2,000 children have been separated from their parents in recent weeks and placed in government-contracted shelters — hundreds of miles away, in some cases — under a “zero tolerance’’ policy toward families caught illegally entering the U.S. Many are from drug- and violence-wracked Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador.

Amid an internatio­nal outcry,

Trump last week issued an executive order to stop the separation of families and said parents and children will instead be detained together.

But parents already separated from their children were left in the dark on when and how they would be reunited, and Homeland Security seemed only to sow more confusion over the weekend.

“The facts set forth before the Court portray reactive governance — responses to address a chaotic circumstan­ce of the Government’s own making,’’ Sabraw wrote. “They belie measured and ordered governance, which is central to the concept of due process enshrined in our Constituti­on.’’

 ?? AP PHOTO ?? Protestors carry signs and chant slogans in front of Federal Courthouse in Los Angeles on Tuesday.
AP PHOTO Protestors carry signs and chant slogans in front of Federal Courthouse in Los Angeles on Tuesday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada