Cape Breton Post

Nuclear sensors went off-line after blast

- FRANCOIS MURPHY

VIENNA — The operator of a global network of radioactiv­ity sensors said on Monday its two Russian sites closest to a mysterious explosion on Aug. 8 went off-line two days after the blast, raising concern about possible tampering by Russia.

The Russian Defence Ministry, which operates the two stations, did not immediatel­y reply to a request for comment.

Russia’s state nuclear agency Rosatom has acknowledg­ed that nuclear workers were killed in the explosion, which occurred during a rocket engine test near the White Sea in far northern Russia.

The explosion also caused a spike in radiation in a nearby city and prompted a local run on iodine, which is used to reduce the effects of radiation exposure.

Russian authoritie­s have given no official explanatio­n for why the blast triggered the rise in radiation. U.S.-based nuclear experts have said they suspect Russia was testing a nuclearpow­ered cruise missile vaunted by President Vladimir Putin last year.

“We’re ... addressing w/ station operators technical problems experience­d at two neighborin­g stations,” Lassina Zerbo, head of the Comprehens­ive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organizati­on (CTBTO), said on Twitter overnight.

The CTBTO’s Internatio­nal Monitoring System includes atmospheri­c sensors that pick up so-called radionucli­de particles wafting through the air. Zerbo said data from stations on or near the path of a potential plume of gas from the explosion were still being analyzed.

The two Russian monitoring stations nearest the explosion, Dubna and Kirov, stopped transmitti­ng on Aug. 10, and Russian officials told the CTBTO they were having “communicat­ion and network issues,” a CTBTO spokeswoma­n said on Monday.

“We’re awaiting further reports on when the stations and/or the communicat­ion system will be restored to full functional­ity.”

While the CTBTO’s IMS network is global and its stations report data back to CTBTO headquarte­rs in Vienna, those stations are operated by the countries in which they are located.

It is not clear what caused the outage or whether the stations might have been tampered with by Russia, analysts said.

“About 48 hours after the incident in Russia on Aug. 8 these stations stopped transmitti­ng data. I find that to be a curious coincidenc­e,” Daryl Kimball, executive director of the Arms Control Associatio­n, a Washington-based think tank.

He and other analysts said any Russian tampering with IMS stations would be a serious matter but it was also likely to be futile as other IMS or national stations could also pick up telltale particles.

“There is no point in what Russia seems to have tried to do. The network of internatio­nal sensors is too dense for one country withholdin­g data to hide an event,” said Jeffrey Lewis, director of the East Asia Non-Proliferat­ion Program at the Middlebury Institute in California.

The CTBTO’s Zerbo also posted a simulation of the explosion’s possible plume, showing it reaching Dubna and Kirov on Aug. 10 and Aug. 11, two and three days after the explosion.

Rosatom has said the accident, which killed five of its staff, involved “isotope power sources.”

 ?? LEONHARD FOEGER REUTERS ?? Antennas of a testing facility for seismic and infrasound technologi­es of the Comprehens­ive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organizati­on are shown in the garden of its headquarte­rs in Vienna, Austria, in 2017. •
LEONHARD FOEGER REUTERS Antennas of a testing facility for seismic and infrasound technologi­es of the Comprehens­ive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organizati­on are shown in the garden of its headquarte­rs in Vienna, Austria, in 2017. •

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada