Cape Breton Post

Labour president critical of attacks.

Labour president critical of attacks on workers’ rights

- DANNY CAVANAGH news@cbpost.com @capebreton­post Danny Cavanagh is president of the Nova Scotia Federation of Labour, which represents 70,000 members in over 400 union locals.

I watched Premier Stephen McNeil on television last week announcing his departure and again offering a few statements on how the union leaders in Nova Scotia need to act differentl­y and be part of the solution.

Most of these statements were, however, lacking any productive details. Details like union leaders have a legal responsibi­lity to look after their members and unions have a legal obligation to bargain on their members’ behalf.

McNeil knows full well that our unions have wanted to work with the government, but to no avail. The good premier has been a oneperson show who dictated his terms and when those were not acceptable he legislated his way to get what he wanted.

Since McNeil became premier in 2013, he has imposed more antiworker legislated pieces than any other government in Nova Scotia history to get his way. He was the boss, and he took matters into his own hands. It was his way or the highway.

The workers’ rights he attacked are enshrined in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The McNeil government was not elected on a mandate to attack the labour movement or circumvent the collective bargaining process. The premier chose to legislate rather than engage in the legal processes of collective bargaining to achieve positive change. The premier liked to portray unions and union leaders as greedy - painting unions as obstacles, only concerned for themselves and leaders who oppose everything.

When it was first elected, the McNeil government promised to be the most transparen­t and accountabl­e government we had ever seen. McNeil promised to open the electricit­y market and break Nova Scotia Power's monopoly. His plan to amalgamate nine regional health authoritie­s into the Nova Scotia Health Authority, and to put some union members into different unions, didn't work. That idea took away local autonomy and had little to no savings for tax-payers. Then, the government moved to eliminate local school boards. Both moves gave the government more control and control was McNeil‘s end game.

Handing over the section of the Trans-Canada highway to a private developer will no doubt prove to be another costly mistake.

McNeil has been a premier who would rather have surpluses, no matter the cost. It was through cuts in budgets for health care, education, long-term care, and other department­s that created surpluses. Funding to women’s groups was also cut. He froze public sector wages for two years and stymied the long-service award. The lack of treating workers with respect, not just at the bargaining table but elsewhere, seemed to be a badge of pride. His statements of being openly accountabl­e and transparen­t have been far from the truth of how things have happened under his leadership.

There is one sad reality in McNeil’s legacy, and that's poverty. Child and family poverty in our province has been on the climb, and he and others sat by and watched it get worse while thousands of Nova Scotian children went, and continue to go hungry. But don't worry, the budget was balanced. Although, corporatio­ns saw tax cuts - in February 2020, those tax cuts meant some $80 million less in revenue, while children suffer in poverty.

The long-term care and healthcare systems were broken well before the COVID-19 pandemic, and McNeil would not (and still has not) admit it was a crisis. The tragedy at Northwood: the government knew it was a problem and had refused requests for more funding. McNeil contends that we do not need a full enquiry, and that a review is good enough.

Additional­ly, we still have a doctor shortage, and privatizat­ion is merely lining the pockets of corporate friends with taxpayers' dollars.

Now McNeil is out the door, so to speak, and taxpayers need to ask, who will be left to pay all the legal wrangling when there was no need to impose heavy-handed tactics on the collective bargaining process? We have a legal right to collective bargaining, and we need to exercise that right.

If he, as the boss, really wanted that harmonious labour relations climate, he could have had it. He made the choices, not the unions. Let's be clear; union members did not create the fiscal mess. We were always ready and willing to work with them.

The next Liberal leader is guaranteed to be a fall guy - left taking on the wrongdoing­s and mistakes of McNeil's legacy. Whomever that is and to the other parties, let us be clear: we are here to work with you. That needs to happen in an open and accountabl­e way that is reasonable, balanced and proactive.

 ?? CONTRIBUTE­D ?? Stephen McNeil, above, chose to “legislate rather than engage,” says Nova Scotia Federation of Labour Danny Cavanagh.
CONTRIBUTE­D Stephen McNeil, above, chose to “legislate rather than engage,” says Nova Scotia Federation of Labour Danny Cavanagh.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada