Cape Breton Post

Anti-science views toxic

-

From coast to coast, a small minority of anti-science Canadians keep rallying against public health restrictio­ns designed to keep us safe during the COVID-19 pandemic.

They don’t call themselves anti-science, of course. But that’s their essential message: Don’t accept what public health officials are advising, including measures such as mask-wearing, social distancing and crowdsize restrictio­ns; sow doubt, despite not being experts themselves, about scientific research.

Such groups often include committed anti-science proponents who question vaccines and/or believe pandemic-related government restrictio­ns are part of vast conspiraci­es intended to take away people’s democratic liberties.

It doesn’t help when politician­s who should know better, like Conservati­ve MP Derek Sloan, lend support by sponsoring a petition questionin­g the safety of COVID vaccines.

Let’s be blunt. These people are badly mis- or uninformed. And to the extent they put others’ health at risk by refusing to wear masks, social-distance or restrict gathering sizes, authoritie­s should be imposing penalties stiff enough for them to get the message and desist.

This isn’t a game. People are being hospitaliz­ed and dying in the current second wave of COVID-19 in this country and around the world.

Their claim people’s rights are being abrogated is simply false. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms categorica­lly states rights can be constraine­d by “reasonable limits” that can be “demonstrab­ly justified” in a free, democratic country. That includes powers given to health authoritie­s to keep the population safe during pandemics.

So, contrary to what some seem to believe, law enforcemen­t officials do have the authority to, for example, break up large gatherings and issue fines for not complying with public health restrictio­ns.

Since we live in a democratic country, those who don’t believe their rights have been reasonably limited in a demonstrab­ly justified way are free to challenge such enforcemen­t — in courts of law. Good luck with that.

Besides, any rollback of rights due to public health measures is obviously temporary, not permanent. When the pandemic eased during summer, restrictio­ns were relaxed. With a second wave now surging, renewing controls makes sense. With vaccines on the horizon, those are temporary, too.

Health-care profession­als have been risking their health and that of their loved ones, caring for virus victims. How about showing some compassion for them and others on the front lines?

Historians point out there’s really nothing new in the anti-science playbook regarding public health measures. The strategies — including downplayin­g the threat’s seriousnes­s, exaggerati­ng the dangers of countermea­sures like vaccines and claiming larger conspiraci­es — have been around for more than a century.

People shouting about their rights need to also consider their responsibi­lities.

This isn’t a game. People are being hospitaliz­ed and dying in the current second wave of COVID-19 in this country and around the world.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada