Feds mull options as Métis self-government bill threatens to collapse

The federal government is mulling a path forward af‐ ter the Métis NationSaskatchewan dropped support for its own pro‐ posed self-government leg‐ islation, another blow to the controversial Bill C-53.

If passed, the bill would recognize Métis political as‐ sociations in Alberta, Saskatchewan and Ontario as Indigenous governments, but it faces vigorous opposition from First Nations in Ontario and other Métis in Manitoba and Alberta.

Métis NationSaskatchewan (MN-S) Presi‐ dent Glen McCallum an‐ nounced the move in a Wednesday statement.

He said the bill's "onesize-fits-all" approach now has his group entangled in "legal and political pressures" in Alberta and Ontario.

Critics say the surprise about-face is a welcome shift that effectively spells doom for the beleaguered bill.

"It's dead," said Will Goodon, housing minister for the Manitoba Métis Federa‐ tion (MMF).

"The coffin has been nailed shut. It's being low‐ ered into the ground."

Scott McLeod, chief of Nipissing First Nation and spokesman for the Chiefs of Ontario umbrella organiza‐ tion on the issue, said, "It's definitely a positive out‐ come."

"I wouldn't be surprised if the federal government doesn't back down at this time. If they do, it's admitting that they made a gross mis‐ take," he added.

"I'm thinking it might just kind of sit on the shelf and die. Either way, I think the First Nations here in Ontario would be happy."

A spokesperson for Crown-Indigenous Relations Minister Gary Anandasan‐ garee wouldn't comment on the bill's future.

"We will continue to work with the Métis governments in Alberta, Ontario, and Saskatchewan to recognize their rights, in ways that work for them and in the spirit of reconciliation," wrote Joanna Sivasankaran by text Thurs‐ day morning.

Dispute over Ontario communities

The proposed legislation is contentious chiefly because of the recognition it would af‐ ford the Métis Nation of On‐ tario (MNO).

For years the MMF ac‐ cused MNO of watering down Métis national identity. At the core of the dispute are six new "historic" Métis com‐ munities, some as far east as the Ontario-Quebec border, recognized in 2017.

The Métis Nation emerged as distinct people in the Prairies in the 18th cen‐ tury, but whether the Métis homeland stretches to east‐ ern Ontario is a source of controversy.

The MMF cut ties with the Métis National Council in 2021 over the issue and has since formed an alliance with McLeod's Chiefs of Ontario, which also rejects the new communities.

Not all Alberta Métis in support

Last month the Federal Court ordered Crown-Indigenous Relations to amend its selfgovernment agreement with the Métis Nation of Alberta (MNA), which the bill also proposes to recognize.

Some Métis in Alberta re‐ ject MNA's authority and al‐ lege the bill usurps their rights to self-determination and tramples their right to be consulted.

In a joint statement, MNA and MNO decried the pro‐ cess they've undergone as di‐ visive and marred by misin‐ formation.

"For the past 10 months, our Métis governments, citi‐ zens and communities have endured a legislative process - not of our own making that was often unfair, de‐ layed, disrespectful and de‐ moralizing," they said.

"This process enabled, and at times encouraged, misunderstandings and divi‐ sion between ourselves and other Métis and First Nation communities."

The Wabun Tribal Council in eastern Ontario already launched a court challenge against the MNO agreement, while the Chiefs of Ontario continue to wage a pressure campaign to "kill the bill."

In their statement, MNA and MNO wished their Saskatchewan counterpart well but vowed to fight on to cement their self-govern‐ ment rights.

"Nothing has ever come easy to the Métis, and this journey to self-government is no different," they said.

"Finally securing our right‐ ful place in the Canadian fed‐ eration means too much to our citizens and communities to allow for this colonial pro‐ cess - that has been filled with misinformation and harm - to deter us from achieving the dreams of our ancestors and aspirations of future generations of Métis people."

The statement didn't ex‐ pressly promise to further pursue Bill C-53, however. Rather it pledged to ensure Canada lives up to its consti‐ tutional commitments and obligations to the Métis.

Way forward unclear

It's not clear if the bill can move forward at all with one of its subjects withdrawing support.

Goodon called the abrupt shift a political embarrass‐ ment for the Métis National Council (MNC), which repre‐ sents the three provincial groups and one in British Co‐ lumbia.

Just last week, in a face-toface meeting with the prime minister, national council President Cassidy Caron told Justin Trudeau she looked forward to C-53's swift pas‐ sage.

"That is ultimately what our ancestors have always been working towards," she said.

The MNC issued a terse, three-sentence statement Thursday promising to sup‐ port its Métis governments

as they pursue self-determi‐ nation, but otherwise offered little clarity on the path for‐ ward.

The bill, stalled for mon‐ ths after an exhaustive com‐ mittee study, still must pass third reading in the House of Commons then repeat the legislative process in the Sen‐ ate before it can become law.