Diesel World

SMOKE RINGS

-

By 1931, Packard’s aero diesels were on sale and certified by the Aeronautic­s Branch of the Department of Commerce but slow sales and the Depression would force them to discontinu­e production. By the time Packard was done building radial aircraft engines in 1933, Guiberson had built two experiment­al radial diesels, the A-980 and the A-914, and was ramping up to do more.

The Numbers

Like Packard, Thaheld initially adopted a single valve cylinder head, where the engine inhaled and exhaled through the same valve. This simplified the valvetrain but limited power and efficiency. The first A-980 (980 ci) radial of 1931 made 185 horsepower from a 4.81 x 6 inch bore and stroke. It flew successful­ly in a Waco 10 biplane and was eventually given government certificat­ion. In 1934, Thahald completed the A-918 engine (918 ci, 4.75 x 5.75 inch bore and stroke) which made 240 hp at 2020 rpm. It went as far as getting the Navy 50-hour certificat­ion; but, by 1936, the Navy decided the engine was too heavy for the rated output.

Thahald determined the one valve per cylinder design wasn’t optimal and developed a two-valve engine. This led to the A-1020 engine, which was certified by the CAA (Civil Aeronautic­s Authority) in January 1940. The A-1020 was a 4-stroke engine with nine cylinders that displaced 1,020 cubic inches (5.12 x 5.5 inch bore and stroke) and was rated for a sustained 310 hp at 2150 rpm, with a maximum rating of 325 hp at 2275 rpm.

The A-1020 was tested extensivel­y in a Stinson Reliant 4-seat aircraft against the original Wright Whirlwind R760 gas engine (320 hp @ 2200 rpm). Though the diesel engine itself was heavier than the gas, because of certain installati­on expedienci­es for the diesel, the overall aircraft was only six pounds heavier. Aircraft performanc­e, was comparable between the engines but the diesel used at least a third less fuel. Plus, diesel fuel was only $.06/gallon in 1940 versus $.23/ gallon for aviation gas. Another notable plus for the diesel was a higher service ceiling. The Wright gasser was certified to 14,500 feet. The A-1020, with nearly double the compressio­n ratio of the gasser, performed well at 20,000 feet, though it was finally certified for a conservati­ve 18,500 feet.

WWII

The Guiberson was approved for U.S. military aircraft but fuel standardiz­ation worked against it. Except for certain narrow applicatio­ns, the U.S. military air and ground forces were all gasoline, from motorcycle­s to aircraft. A glimmer of hope came when certain Lendlease countries receiving U.s.-built tanks requested diesels. All mainline American tanks of the era used aircooled radial aircraft gas engines. Guiberson adapted their A-1020 into the T-1020 (“T” for tank) and was soon building engines for Lend-lease tanks. Or rather Buda Engine Company was. Buda was contracted to build the Guiberson tank engine and thousands were manufactur­ed. The T-1020 differed from the aircraft version in having a large cooling fan/flywheel and

 ??  ?? 
This is a T-1020 on display at the Hillyer Aviation Museum, San Carlos, California, shot by Daderot in 2015. There are several T-1020s on display at aircraft museums around the world used to represent the aircraft version. With few difference­s...
 This is a T-1020 on display at the Hillyer Aviation Museum, San Carlos, California, shot by Daderot in 2015. There are several T-1020s on display at aircraft museums around the world used to represent the aircraft version. With few difference­s...
 ??  ??  In tanks, this is the side of the engine you saw when you opened the rear access hatches. It has the original tank mounting bracket and Mike built a stand to mount it. This side of the engine has the low-pressure lift pump and the accessory drives as...
 In tanks, this is the side of the engine you saw when you opened the rear access hatches. It has the original tank mounting bracket and Mike built a stand to mount it. This side of the engine has the low-pressure lift pump and the accessory drives as...
 ??  ??  A closeup of Mike Moffit’s Guiberson showing the injector above and the top of the pump below, as well as one pushrod tube in place (left) and one not yet installed. With a low-pressure injection system and a low compressio­n ratio of 14.5:1, these...
 A closeup of Mike Moffit’s Guiberson showing the injector above and the top of the pump below, as well as one pushrod tube in place (left) and one not yet installed. With a low-pressure injection system and a low compressio­n ratio of 14.5:1, these...

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada