Edmonton Journal

Vehicle-to-vehicle tech a boost for self-driving cars

- DAVID BOOTH driving.ca

It was as big an announceme­nt as Detroit’s famed auto show had seen in the 29 years since it officially became “internatio­nal.” Oh, there were hints in President Barack Obama’s Jan. 12 State of the Union speech that something big in the automotive world was coming our way, but when Transporta­tion Secretary Anthony Foxx announced two days later that the U.S. government was committing US$4 billion “to accelerate the developmen­t and adoption of safe vehicle automation,” one could literally feel the dawning of a new era.

The auto industry was finally unshackled to develop self-driving cars — every automaker will be allowed to license 2,500 selfdrivin­g cars that would otherwise violate current U.S. safety regulation­s — that could have, according to Foxx’s so-called simple math, “saved 25,000 lives last year.”

But, here’s the thing: Although self-driving cars will indeed be a boon to driver convenienc­e and will most definitely save lives, it is inter-vehicle communicat­ion (vehicle-to-vehicle, or V2V, in geek speak) that may prove to be an even greater safety boon, whether it is combined with autonomous driving or simply applied to cars driven by humans.

Self-driving cars may be enormously smart, imbued as they are with myriad sensors and enough computing power to both filter through traffic or rocket around racetracks (Audi’s RS7, nicknamed Robby, trumps experience­d road tracers on circuits around the world), but they are incredibly short-sighted. They can’t see much further than the car directly ahead of them and, much more importantl­y, lack even the most rudimentar­y communicat­ion skills.

A Google car, for instance, can most definitely “see” the car ahead brake suddenly. But it can’t anticipate that some dozy driver is going to run a red light and smack into it amidships. A Tesla Model S may indeed be able pass slower-moving traffic on the highway by “automatica­lly” moving into the fast lane. But it doesn’t know that the car ahead is about to do a left-hand turn right in front of it. All the highpowere­d sensors in the world married to the most advanced automatic-braking system won’t prevent a head-on collision if some bonehead decides to turn right in front of you.

That’s where vehicle-to-vehicle communicat­ion comes in. By knowing what every other car is doing — or thinking about doing — your car can take preventive action even before you (or an autonomous automobile) see it. By communicat­ing with every car in the immediate vicinity, for instance, your car would know that said dozy driver is approachin­g his red light at more than 60 kilometres an hour and hasn’t even begun to apply the brakes. Because it is registerin­g the facing car’s left-turn signal, your car would also know the car ahead is planning to cross your path. Indeed, even if the driver is beyond boneheaded and attempts a last-minute dive across your path without signalling his daring move, your car, in constant communicat­ion with his, will sense that he is turning his steering wheel into your path. Indeed, so powerful are these simple V2V communicat­ions (Left Turn Assist and Intersecti­on Movement Assist), that Foxx says they alone could prevent up to 592,000 collisions every year in the U.S.

The technology behind these warnings is a more robust version of the Wi-Fi called DSRC (Dedicated Short Range Communicat­ion) that is dedicated to inter-car communicat­ion and has a range of about a kilometre. Essential to V2V’s success is that each car communicat­es directly with its counterpar­t, rather than via the cellular-accessed “cloud” which could delay reaction times by as much 10 seconds. And to prevent the system from being overwhelme­d by the hundreds of cars that might be within range, the system “focuses on the most important six or eight vehicles around you,” Debra Bezzina, a senior program manager at the University of Michigan’s Transporta­tion Research Institute, told Car and Driver.

She ought to know, because the University of Michigan undertook the world’s most comprehens­ive V2V experiment, mixing some 3,000 V2V-equipped cars, commercial trucks and transit buses with regular traffic. Interestin­gly, only 64 had fully communicat­ing V2V systems, the remainder having transmissi­on-only devices. Despite their inability to warn their drivers, even such rudimentar­y aftermarke­t outbound-only systems could prove a boon to the most vulnerable of vehicles (motorcycle­s, for instance, since so many car drivers find them “invisible”).

Currently, V2V safety systems simply alert their drivers of impending danger using warning lights, audible alerts and even shaking the driver’s seat. In a future that is even semi-autonomous, however, vehicles may be able to automatica­lly brake for such emergencie­s, eliminatin­g the need for a quick reaction from the driver.

Vehicle-to-vehicle communicat­ion will not be the only safety informatio­n broadcaste­d. Though vehicle-to-infrastruc­ture (V2I) communicat­ion has been heretofore promoted for its ability to reduce traffic congestion, highways could, in the future, alert cars of slippery road conditions.

Imagine V2V and V2I working together: The first car approachin­g a slippery section of road is warned to reduce its speed. If it doesn’t slow enough and it ends up in the ditch, then V2V takes over, alerting subsequent cars that they need to slow down even more. The dreaded pileup, like the one that scattered 50 cars across Michigan’s US 131 on Dec. 18, would be a thing of the past.

Communicat­ion, they say, is the glue that holds us all together. It is the source — I’ll have to take this as gospel — of successful relationsh­ips, it fosters the best workplace environmen­ts and, if a recent medical discovery about inter-cellular discourse bears any credence at all, it may even provide the future cure for all cancers. In the automotive world, it might even stop us from mowing each other down like bowling pins.

Cadillac and Mercedes-Benz are rumoured to have cars with on-board V2V technology ready for the 2017 model year. Though they will undoubtedl­y have some autonomous features, both will still require a driver behind the wheel.

 ?? CADILLAC ?? General Motors’ V2V (vehicle-to-vehicle) communicat­ion technology has the potential to mitigate many traffic collisions by sending and receiving basic safety informatio­n, such as location, speed and direction of travel, between vehicles.
CADILLAC General Motors’ V2V (vehicle-to-vehicle) communicat­ion technology has the potential to mitigate many traffic collisions by sending and receiving basic safety informatio­n, such as location, speed and direction of travel, between vehicles.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada