Edmonton Journal

Engineers to consider widening of High Level Bridge

- ELISE STOLTE estolte@postmedia.com twitter.com/estolte

The City of Edmonton just hired structural engineers to evaluate if it’s possible to widen the more than 100-year-old High Level Bridge for cyclists and pedestrian­s.

Pedestrian­s are feeling threatened by cyclists, especially as they cross on the narrow east side, and city officials say they are looking at all options as they prepare the bridge for regularly scheduled rehabilita­tion.

“It’s a technical feasibilit­y investigat­ion,” said Jason Meliefste, branch manager for infrastruc­ture planning, after giving an update to council’s urban planning committee Friday.

They’ll pitch the rehabilita­tion for Edmonton’s 2019-2022 capital budget cycle, and that gives the opportunit­y to improve the bridge, too. “It’s a once-ina-lifetime opportunit­y with that bridge.”

At committee, Coun. Ben Henderson said he still hears from many pedestrian­s now feeling uncomforta­ble using the High Level Bridge since the city installed suicide barriers in 2016.

He wondered if the city should shut cycling access to the east side of the bridge.

City officials said they’re looking at that, if they can find a way to improve connectivi­ty at each end. Currently, shutting access to one side would mean long wait times for cyclists forced to cross at the north and south intersecti­ons.

They are also planning a cycling education campaign this fall to stress respectful and safe behaviour.

Meliefste said the structural engineerin­g study will also look at the feasibilit­y of putting an LRT connection across the bridge for a planned loop called the downtown circulator. That would run through the Old Strathcona area, possibly along Whyte Avenue, and connect back downtown.

Other community groups have proposed designs for an urban park on the top of the bridge. A street car currently runs there from the spring through fall.

This study will inform planners “to know whether or not it’s a fatal flaw. Can we do this or can we not?” said Meliefste.

“Because there’s no point in having a broader conversati­on if you’ve already explored that (from an engineerin­g perspectiv­e) you can’t even do it.”

Meliefste expects to get the technical study back by this fall. Then his team will hold broader public consultati­ons, before presenting different options to council.

It’s a oncein-a-lifetime opportunit­y with that bridge.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada