Edmonton Journal

Battle over abandoned oil wells will go to top court

- ALLISON MCNEELY AND KEVIN ORLAND

CALGARY A battle over whether energy-company creditors should help pay for cleaning up thousands of abandoned oil wells may be heading to the Supreme Court of Canada.

At the centre of the dispute is Redwater Energy Corp., a small publicly traded oil producer in Alberta that filed for bankruptcy in late 2015. The receiver that’s liquidatin­g the company argues it should be able to sell its best wells and leave the worst behind for an energy industry-funded group to clean up. The province’s regulator argues that buyers should have to take both good and bad wells, even if it means that the sale proceeds will be lower.

A court in Alberta sided with the receiver in May 2016, reducing companies’ concerns about the legal liability of walking away from some of their oil wells. Since then, the number of inactive, abandoned, or otherwise orphaned sites has more than doubled to 3,200, according to the Orphan Well Associatio­n, the cleanup group. The provincial government has given the organizati­on an emergency loan to fund the growing costs.

The Alberta Court of Appeal upheld the lower court ruling in a 2-1 decision last April. The government-run Alberta Energy Regulator and the Orphan Well Associatio­n, who say they’re protecting regulatory and public interests, have appealed the matter to the Supreme Court of Canada.

The questions about who should bear environmen­tal costs, combined with the importance of the lower court’s decision and the implicatio­ns for the industry means the Supreme Court of Canada is likely to look at this case, said Kyle Kashuba, a lawyer in Torys LLP restructur­ing practice.

“It does have ramificati­ons for other provinces. That makes me think the Supreme Court will hear it,” he said. “It’s kind of become such a major issue.”

Typically, proceeds from liquidatin­g assets go to pay back creditors. Any court decision that results in lenders getting less money in bankruptci­es could ultimately force banks to charge more for financing, as they try to recoup lost income. But if the lower court’s ruling stands, the industry-funded Alberta Energy Regulator may have to collect more money from energy companies to help pay for the remediatio­n, and the public may need to shoulder some of the cost.

The problem is increasing­ly urgent for Alberta as more oil companies go broke. About 1,000 oil sites in Alberta with liabilitie­s of more than $56 million have been renounced since the May 2016 court decision, according to the Alberta Energy Regulator.

“Disclaimin­g unprofitab­le sites allows a company to reap the benefits of producing Alberta’s natural resources while avoiding the costs to repair the land, permanentl­y impacting the environmen­t, the economy, and the safety of Albertans,” Ryan Bartlett, a spokesman for the Alberta Energy Regulator, said by email.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada