Edmonton Journal

ALBERTA NEEDS INCENTIVES TO DIVERSIFY ECONOMY

Outmoded myths are standing in the way, writes Lori Kent.

- Lori Kent is executive director of the Resource Diversific­ation Council.

Alberta continues to endure the boom-and-bust struggle of a resource-based economy.

The benefits of diversifyi­ng Alberta’s economy are welldocume­nted and most experts agree diversific­ation is imperative to the success of our province and nation. Yet it is slow to be realized. Alberta has largely failed to attract new investment in energy-diversific­ation projects, which has led to continued volatility in the economy, less opportunit­y for our children and less spending on social programs.

In order to bring these investment­s to Alberta and grow and stabilize our revenues, we need to compete for the business. Investment-attraction programs, or incentives, are a much-debated but little-understood concept and the “myths” surroundin­g them cloud their importance.

Myth No. 1: It puts government in the business of business

Creating an investment-incentive program that is transparen­t, unbiased and predictabl­e is not “doing business;” it is good governance. It is levelling the playing field with competing jurisdicti­ons and combating market failures. The government should be focused on such services as health care, education, and a framework for regulation that protects our citizens. To do that, they need stable and growing revenues that come from capital investment­s in the province.

Myth No. 2: Let the market decide The market has been deciding — and it has sent close to $237 billion out of $240 billion of new and planned capital investment in petrochemi­cal and chemical manufactur­ing in recent years to the U.S. Gulf Coast. Alberta has received only $2.5 billion. This is not a perfectly functionin­g market; other jurisdicti­ons are tilting the field. The U.S. Gulf Coast has aggressive and well-establishe­d state and municipal incentives, which are long-term and customizab­le. The market is responding in a big way.

Myth No. 3: It’s too expensive Other jurisdicti­ons have realized that offering investment incentives generates revenue. A successful Alberta example is the Petrochemi­cal Diversific­ation Program (PDP) that was completed in 2016. This program will award $500 million in royalty credits over three years once the facilities are operating. Before any royalty credits are granted, government­s will have collected more than $500 million in taxes, and that is just during constructi­on. Once the projects are operationa­l, the government will continue to collect taxes during the 30-plus-year operating lives of the projects. This is about growing the pie, not dividing it.

There are ways to make incentive programs risk-free for the government. Incentives that are paid after constructi­on, and are contingent on a certain level of investment, operationa­l performanc­e, minimum job creation and environmen­tal and social benefits to the jurisdicti­ons, make a lot of sense — and dollars.

Myth No. 4: Corporate welfare Corporate welfare is used to invoke indignatio­n; big corporatio­ns have lots of money, why are we giving them money, or tax breaks, or other incentives?

The truth is, companies are building and expanding facilities all over the world, every day. Companies will build where they can get the best rate of return for their money. The jurisdicti­ons where those facilities are built realize immense benefit in the form of good-paying and highly skilled jobs, tax revenue, and spin-off industries.

It isn’t about whether the companies need the money; it is about Alberta wanting those jobs and taxes long-term, and doing what it can to get them to build here. The competitio­n for Amazon’s HQ2 proved this point — in order to win, you have to be competitiv­e.

Resource Diversific­ation Council members have proposed more than $26 billion in energy-diversific­ation projects that could be built in Alberta. If even only three quarters of these projects go through, their constructi­on alone would add over $3 billion to municipal, corporate and personal income tax, and direct full-time employment of over 42,000 in Alberta and Canada.

Once operationa­l, these projects would add approximat­ely $15 billion in municipal, corporate and personal income tax in Alberta and Canada over their operating life, helping to address the current deficit problems being faced by the province and ensure diversity and prosperity going forward.

We need to dispel these myths and ensure that Alberta is attracting high-quality investment­s that will support a prosperous, stable future for our province.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada