Edmonton Journal

Amid Nixon controvers­y, UCP heads for the doors

- GRAHAM THOMSON gthomson@postmedia.com Twitter.com/graham_journal

Well, that ended in a hurry.

The fall sitting of Alberta’s legislativ­e assembly wrapped up Wednesday afternoon after the United Conservati­ve Party hit the eject button.

The UCP had been talking about keeping the sitting going to debate major pieces of legislatio­n introduced by the NDP government over the past week or so.

And that was a reasonable position considerin­g the complexity of the legislatio­n that included massive changes to the Workers’ Compensati­on Board and getting “dark money” out of politics.

But the sitting came to a screeching halt Wednesday after the UCP folded its tent and headed to the exit.

While everyone is decking the halls this time of year, the NDP had been swabbing the deck — with the UCP’s house leader, Jason Nixon.

Premier Rachel Notley began wiping the legislatur­e floor with Nixon’s credibilit­y Tuesday when the Journal broke a story about how, as a business owner a decade ago, he had fired a woman after she complained about being sexually harassed by a client of Nixon’s.

The woman had been working for Nixon’s firm in B.C. After she protested, a B.C. human rights tribunal investigat­ed and awarded her $32,000.

The story has particular resonance now because the legislatur­e had been debating Bill 30, an act that includes protection for workers against sexual harassment.

Nixon had argued against the bill. That gave Notley an opening to slam him hard, and demand UCP Leader Jason Kenney fire him as house leader.

“Mr. Nixon has gone into the house and fought against the bill that would have protected someone in Alberta in the very same situation as the woman Mr. Nixon chose to fire,” a fuming Notley told reporters Tuesday.

Later, she turned the tables on Nixon in question period by ignoring a question from him on the carbon tax to attack him over his actions as a business owner a decade ago: “Instead of defending a woman who complained to him about sexual harassment, two days later he fired her.”

She had Nixon on the defensive, an unusual spot for the Opposition during question period. It’s supposed to be the other way around.

“I deeply regret some of the decisions that were made by myself and my organizati­on while handling that human resources issue,” said a contrite Nixon. “It was not right then, and it is not right now.”

The rest of Tuesday’s question period was a subdued affair, with the normally combative UCP looking like a deflating balloon.

Same with Wednesday as deputy premier Sarah Hoffman took her turn to chastise Nixon during question period, saying she was “disappoint­ed” he was still Opposition house leader.

Again, Nixon had to explain himself and admit he had made mistakes. It didn’t help Nixon’s case that the woman he fired was a 27-year-old mother of three who had no other income. And he fired her a few days before Christmas.

That certainly seems to be why the UCP was happy to end the sitting Wednesday. The party simply didn’t want to have Nixon pummelled daily with little to defend himself other than offering “regrets.”

Government house leader Brian Mason said he had expected the sitting to run until next week because of the UCP’s determinat­ion to debate legislatio­n. But he said the UCP contacted him Tuesday afternoon to talk about wrapping things up quickly.

“They really couldn’t wait to get out of here,” said Mason during a news conference Wednesday.

A bit later, Nixon paid a visit to the press gallery offices to dispute Mason’s account. Nixon insisted the UCP decided to wrap things up because it had done all it could in the fall sitting.

The NDP, though, is feeling rather smug, not just because it had Nixon in an awkward spot, but because the government passed so much legislatio­n this fall, including bills to protect, among others, gay-straight alliances, convenienc­e store workers, consumers and workers facing unsafe jobs.

The NDP likely won’t feel so smug Thursday night after the results of the Calgary-Lougheed byelection roll in. Kenney is expected to win in a landslide.

Then he’ll get a seat in the legislatur­e, and the UCP can parade him into the assembly in late February when the spring sitting starts. By then, the UCP hopes Albertans will have forgotten the Nixon unpleasant­ness as people focus on the much-anticipate­d Kenney vs. Notley debates in the assembly — with just one year to go at that point until the provincial election.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada