Edmonton Journal

‘The car is at fault, not the pedestrian’

EXPERTS PIN DEATH ON SELF-DRIVING VEHICLE

- Tom Krisher And JAcques BilleAud in Tempe, Ariz.

Two experts say video of a deadly crash involving a self-driving Uber vehicle shows the sport utility vehicle’s laser and radar sensors should have spotted a pedestrian, and computers should have braked to avoid the crash.

Authoritie­s investigat­ing the crash in a Phoenix suburb released the video of Uber’s Volvo striking a woman as she walked from a darkened area onto a street.

Experts who viewed the video said that the SUV’s sensors should have seen the woman pushing a bicycle and braked before the impact.

Also, Uber’s human backup driver appears on the video to be looking down before the crash and appears startled about the time of the impact.

“The victim did not come out of nowhere. She’s moving on a dark road, but it’s an open road, so Lidar (laser) and radar should have detected and classified her” as a human, said Bryant Walker Smith, a University of South Carolina law professor who studies autonomous vehicles.

Sam Abuelsmaid, an analyst for Navigant Research who also follows autonomous vehicles, said laser and radar systems can see in the dark much better than humans or cameras and that the pedestrian was well within the system’s range.

“It absolutely should have been able to pick her up,” he said. “From what I see in the video it sure looks like the car is at fault, not the pedestrian.”

The video could have a broad impact on autonomous vehicle research, which has been billed as the answer to cutting the 40,000 traffic deaths that occur annually in the U.S. in human-driven vehicles.

Proponents say that human error is responsibl­e for 94 per cent of crashes, and that self-driving vehicles would be better because they see more and don’t get drunk, distracted or drowsy.

But the experts said it appears from the video that there was some sort of flaw in Uber’s selfdrivin­g system.

The video, Smith said, may not show the complete picture, but “this is strongly suggestive of multiple failures of Uber and its system, its automated system, and its safety driver.”

Tempe police, as well as the National Transporta­tion Safety Board and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administra­tion are investigat­ing the Sunday night crash, which occurred outside of a crosswalk on a darkened boulevard.

The crash was the first death involving a fully autonomous test vehicle. The Volvo was in selfdrivin­g mode travelling about 64 km/h with a human backup driver at the wheel when it struck 49-year-old Elaine Herzberg, police said.

The lights on the SUV did not illuminate Herzberg until a second or two before impact, raising questions about whether the vehicle could have stopped in time.

Smith said that from what he observed on the video, the Uber driver appears to be relying too much on the self-driving system by not looking up at the road.

“The safety driver is clearly relying on the fact that the car is driving itself. It’s the old adage that if everyone is responsibl­e no one is responsibl­e,” Smith said. “This is everything gone wrong that these systems, if responsibl­y implemente­d, are supposed to prevent.”

The experts were unsure if the test vehicle was equipped with a video monitor that the backup driver may have been viewing.

Uber immediatel­y suspended all road-testing of such self-driving vehicles in the Phoenix area, Pittsburgh, San Francisco and Toronto.

 ?? SUPPLIED ?? An Uber backup driver appears on video Sunday as the self-driving SUV she is in strikes a pedestrian in a suburb of Phoenix, Ariz. The driver is looking down before the crash and appears startled at about the time of the impact.
SUPPLIED An Uber backup driver appears on video Sunday as the self-driving SUV she is in strikes a pedestrian in a suburb of Phoenix, Ariz. The driver is looking down before the crash and appears startled at about the time of the impact.
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada