Edmonton Journal

MOST B.C. RESIDENTS SEE NEED FOR OIL COMPROMISE

The majority must now speak louder than the pipeline protesters, says John Weston.

- John Weston is a lawyer, author, and former Member of Parliament.

I’m a proud British Columbian but would be ashamed to show my face in Calgary today.

Firstly, we are looking like a bunch of selfish navel-gazers, mindless of the fortunes of fellow Canadians. In the case of Albertans, the jobs we threaten relate to people who have for decades borne a disproport­ionate percentage of Canada’s financial burden. Can’t we find a way to help our countrywom­en and countrymen without harming ourselves?

That question leads to the second point, that pipeline opponents appear to reject out of hand even the most stringent environmen­tal protection­s. Those of us who advocate for B.C.’s splendid environmen­t should be able to find some world-class environmen­tal protection standards in which we can put our faith. Few places in the world have the protection­s that we have, to guard against petroleum spills, on land or at sea. As I argued in the House of Commons, the environmen­t is the economy; we can stand for both. To mindlessly reject resource developmen­t rejects our invaluable assets as Canadians and dismisses a generation of excellent, environmen­t-related technology developed and applied by some of the word’s top experts — Canadian experts.

The third dishearten­ing aspect of the pipeline debate is the debilitati­ng nature of government leaders who make up the rules as they go along. Kinder Morgan has stood by and seen the other two large pipeline projects die — Northern Gateway and Energy East. The company has witnessed the complete paralysis of LNG projects on the West Coast. It has still agreed to 157 difficult conditions and negotiated agreements with 43 Indigenous communitie­s along its route. Remember, this is to develop a pipeline the most of which falls within the company’s existing right-of-way. If a government such as the one in Victoria can reverse such daunting approval processes, what investment in the province is safe? Which foreigner — or British Columbian — would dare to invest in such a mercurial climate? Even a left-leaning prime minister and further left-leaning Alberta premier understand this fundamenta­l truth — add enough uncertaint­y and investment capital flees.

A fourth disconcert­ing point is the most ironic. Those who disregard the importance of a robust economy will be the first to demand higher, more expensive environmen­tal controls, social benefits, and health care. Funded by whom?

As ever, a small minority of belligeren­t protesters seize the lion’s share of media coverage. What can those of us British Columbians do to raise our voices, who welcome investment in our province, who want jobs for ourselves and our kids, who respect the rule of law, and who care about the interests of Albertans and other Canadians as well as our own?

The majority of British Columbians understand that pipelines are safer than trucks or trains in transporti­ng petroleum. The majority of British Columbians are not so hypocritic­al as to drive their cars to environmen­tal protests. The majority of British Columbians care about the environmen­t. We want the world’s best technology and processes in place to protect our majestic oceans and world-renowned natural beauty. Historical­ly, we’ve had the guts to pursue excellence in this province in every imaginable field. There’s every reason to believe we can develop our resources responsibl­y and protect our world-renowned environmen­t in a world-class way.

Indigenous leaders’ consultati­on has been extensive and Kinder Morgan claims it has agreement from 43 Indigenous Communitie­s. The Indian Resource Council and other organizati­ons acknowledg­e the enormous benefits Indigenous communitie­s will realize if the project gets completed. Pipeline protesters now claim that any First Nation which withholds support should be able to block the project. Such thinking effectivel­y condemns any project to failure in the absence of unanimous consent, an unheard-of approval level in any democracy, totally unworkable in a 21st century economy.

In my experience, most British Columbians share four characteri­stics — the Four E’s:

we’re proud of our Environmen­t, and keen to protect it;

we stand up for our Economy because it provides us health care, education, and other ingredient­s of our high quality of life;

we promote the Empowermen­t of Indigenous people; and

we want an Effective Federation, one where government­s work co-operativel­y for the benefit of all Canadians.

Unfortunat­ely, it’s typically those who oppose an initiative who come out to protest. Those in favour stay home. So maybe it’s time we who believe in the Four E’s raise our voices. As I pondered the possibilit­y of starting a rally in support of responsibl­e resource developmen­t, I encountere­d a fledgling organizati­on that seeks to give voice to people with the characteri­stics listed above.

Have a look at Resourcewo­rks, not a company nor a political party, but a group that is trying to give voice to counterbal­ance the naysayers. Any concerned citizen should have a look at its Citizen’s Guide to Tanker Safety and Spill Response on the British Columbia South Coast. Resourcewo­rks has already organized one rally for concerned citizens who support responsibl­e resource developmen­t. If you care about the Four E’s, maybe we’ll see each other at the next one.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada