Edmonton Journal

Canadian cannabis players weigh risks of going to U.S.

U.S. customs policies murky for travellers with major Las Vegas conference ahead

- ARMINA LIGAYA

Shifting statements from U.S. border officials have prompted some Canadian cannabis industry players to think twice about travelling south of the border, just weeks before a significan­t pot industry conference in Las Vegas.

A spokeswoma­n for U.S. Customs and Border Protection said that even if a Canadian traveller’s business does not operate in the U.S., they could be denied entry if their travel activities are cannabis related.

“If the purpose of travel is unrelated to the marijuana industry such as a vacation, shopping trip, visit to relatives, they will generally be admissible to the U.S. However, if they are coming for reasons related to the industry, such as the conference … they may be found inadmissib­le,” said Stephanie Malin, U.S. CBP’s branch chief for northern/coastal regions in an email.

On Oct. 17, Canada became the second country in the world after Uruguay to legalize cannabis for recreation­al use.

In the lead-up to legalizati­on, a statement in September by U.S. border officials had indicated Canadian pot industry workers risked being banned or denied entry. Earlier this month, U.S. CBP updated its statement, saying Canadian cannabis industry workers would “generally be admissible” if travelling for leisure.

The revised stance did not offer clarity as to whether business travel activities for those without direct U.S. involvemen­t would be a red flag under its policies as well.

Meanwhile, Canadian cannabis companies have listed their shares on U.S. stock exchanges — a requiremen­t of which is not having direct involvemen­t in the American pot industry — and are also increasing­ly eyeing opportunit­ies south of the border as the broader sentiment in the U.S. warms up to legalizati­on.

In next month’s U.S. midterm elections, Michigan and North Dakota will vote on ballot initiative­s to legalize cannabis for adult use while Missouri and Utah will vote on medical pot.

And earlier this year, U.S. President Donald Trump signalled he would “probably” support the bill amending the Controlled Substances Act, which could effectivel­y make marijuana federally legal in states where recreation­al consumptio­n is legal. The bill known as the STATES act has been referred to a Senate committee.

The U.S. market for cannabis could be worth more than $65 billion, including illicit demand, more than 10 times the size of Canada’s, according to a recent Scotia Capital Inc. report.

Meanwhile, companies such as Aurora Cannabis and Aphria Inc. have spun off U.S.-focused entities or divested U.S. assets, which allows them to remain compliant with listing requiremen­ts for stock exchanges in the U.S. and the Toronto Stock Exchange.

And next month, cannabis executives will be gathering in Las Vegas for the world’s biggest conference for the industry, MJBiz Con, which lists several Canadian companies among its speakers.

The risk for Canadian travellers in the cannabis industry is “overblown,” said Nick Pateras, the vicepresid­ent of strategy for Lift & Co.

“While they have the power, I don’t think it’s going to be as common an issue or as big an issue as people are worried about … We do no business in the U.S. and have no intention of stepping into that jurisdicti­on until it’s federally legal,” he said.

He said he does not intend to change his travel plans, and if need be, will claim his right to withdraw his applicatio­n for entry.

However, if there are major U.S. entry issues for Canadian cannabis workers, that could be a “huge inhibitor” for Canada’s industry, which has a competitiv­e advantage at the moment, he said.

One executive at a Canadian cannabis grower, who did not want to be named due to the sensitivit­y of the topic, said the company has received legal guidance that there is no legal basis for barring individual­s that operate law-abiding businesses in their respective jurisdicti­ons. The company does not intend to change its U.S. travel plans, including attending the Las Vegas conference, but anticipate­s the border rules will be clarified over time, they added.

Another executive at a Canadian pot firm also intended to attend the conference and anticipate­s that U.S. border officials have “bigger fish to fry.”

Still, there is an “unavoidabl­e risk” for anyone travelling to the U.S. for business reasons, said David Wood, a lawyer with Borden, Ladner and Gervais, based in Calgary.

“Figure out how important your physical presence in the U.S. is and ask yourself whether that’s enough to justify the risk,” he said.

Border officials might not levy a ban and expedite removal of all travellers with a connection to cannabis, but mention of industry involvemen­t could prompt other related questions involving consumptio­n that could cause issues, said Scott Railton, an immigratio­n lawyer at Cascadia Cross-Border Law in Bellingham, Wash.

“There is a risk right now ... You have to read it that way,” he said.

One option to help mitigate that risk would be to send representa­tives who are U.S. citizens, who are always going to be admissible, he added.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada