Edmonton Journal

Movie as agitprop

A heavy hand undermines what could have been a fascinatin­g story

- chris Knight

unplanned

★ out of 5

Cast: Ashley Bratcher, Brooks Ryan, Robia Scott

Director: Chuck Konzelman, Cary Solomon

Duration: 1 h 46 m The newest morality tale from U.S. production company Pure Flix, tells the story of Abby Johnson (Ashley Bratcher), a clinic director for Planned Parenthood who resigned in 2009 and subsequent­ly became a staunch anti-abortion activist.

Well, that did happen. But the script by co-director Cary Solomon, based on Johnson’s memoirs, turns what could have been a fascinatin­g philosophi­cal turnaround into a simplistic piece of U.S. religious/political agitprop. Abby is portrayed as relentless­ly sunny and a devout Christian, while Cheryl (Robia Scott), her boss at the clinic, is a snarling villain who wants to abort every pregnancy she sees.

When Abby asks why the clinic is pushing to double the number of abortions it provides — which is a falsehood about the way the non-profit, reproducti­ve healthcare provider operates — Cheryl explains that it’s like the fries and soft drinks that fast-food restaurant­s use to turn a profit. “Abortion is our fries and sodas,” she hisses. “Abortion is what pays for our salaries.”

In any case, Abby’s change of heart — her road-to-damascus moment, if you will — doesn’t ring true from a narrative point of view. Despite working at the clinic for years, and even observing the removed “products of conception” with detached, scientific fascinatio­n, she freaks out while watching an ultrasound during an abortion. If that’s how it went down — and the court case that followed, dealt with quickly and tidily in the film, suggests otherwise — then make me believe it. Unplanned doesn’t.

But none of this matters, because the film is preaching to the choir; no one who disagrees with its central tenet will be watching. And even if presented to a mixed audience, Unplanned is neither smart enough to rally anyone to its cause, nor dumb enough to alienate those who believe its message. As propaganda, therefore, it’s basically useless. And as cinema, it’s poorly made. But you have a freedom of choice as to whether or not to see it.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada