Edmonton Journal

Conservati­ves must broaden base of support

Building a national party means ending domination by social conservati­ves and western populists, says Antoine Dionne Charest.

- Antoine Dionne Charest is a PHD student in philosophy at Universite de Montreal.

The Conservati­ve Party looks more like the western bloc today than a national party. If it wants to regain Canadians’ confidence, it must represent every region of the country.

Historical­ly, the Conservati­ve Party is an alliance of different groups such as Quebec nationalis­ts, progressiv­es or “Red Tories,” western populists and social conservati­ves. However, today, western populists dominate the party.

The Conservati­ve MPS behind the Buffalo Declaratio­n, who criticize Ottawa’s attitude toward Alberta, remind us of this when they say that Alberta is and remains the Conservati­ve Party’s electoral base.

The purpose of the merger between the Progressiv­e Conservati­ves and the Alliance that succeeded the Reform Party was not to create a western bloc that would occasional­ly win enough seats in Ontario to form a government. Its purpose was to create the Conservati­ve Party of Canada.

The fact that Conservati­ves are unable to widen their base creates an imbalance within the party and its electorate, which remains marginal in major urban centres and some provinces.

This is the case in Quebec, where Conservati­ves are incapable of gaining a foothold. Since 2006, the percentage of Conservati­ve votes in Quebec has continuous­ly decreased. Conservati­ves are not even able to win one-third of the votes.

The opposition between Quebec and Alberta hurts the party. It is unfortunat­e that provinces that value provincial autonomy and decentrali­zation cannot form a durable alliance. Especially since Quebecers and Albertans share the conviction that the country’s unity does not lie at the top, in the federal government, but in its provinces, its peoples and its citizens.

The role that populists play in the party does not help, either. To have a strand that defends the silent majority and promotes pragmatic policies is vital. But it becomes counter-productive when the Conservati­ves are primarily perceived as a populist party.

The influence of American conservati­sm also distorts Canadian conservati­sm. Canadian Conservati­ves never believed that government constitute­s a threat to freedom. Otherwise, John Diefenbake­r would never have adopted the Canadian Bill of Rights. They never believed solely in laissez-faire economics. If they had, Brian Mulroney would have never adopted the GST.

As for social conservati­ves, they must be respected. But they can no longer define the party to the extent that they have until now. Conservati­ves must affirm once and for all that abortion and same sex marriage are fundamenta­l rights. If not, they run the risk of alienating themselves from a majority of Canadians.

So, how to build a national party?

Following John A. Macdonald, George-etienne Cartier, John Diefenbake­r and Brian Mulroney, conservati­ves must offer a national unity platform. They have to show in particular that Quebec and Alberta can work together.

They must articulate a vision that goes beyond the management of public finances, micro economic and social policies and tougher jail sentences. To claim that government is the problem is mere posturing, not a political platform.

Conservati­ves must offer pragmatic solutions and a coherent vision of the country.

They should promote economic policies that combine a responsibl­e exploitati­on of Canada’s natural resources and market solutions to climate change.

They should consider the proposal of former Conservati­ve senator Hugh Segal for a guaranteed annual income. In an economic context where people change jobs more frequently and where working conditions are becoming more and more precarious, this would not only help achieve equality of opportunit­y, but also reduce government spending.

They should also propose to reform the

Senate into a House of the Provinces, where members of Parliament from every provincial legislatur­e and representa­tives of First Nations and Inuit people would sit. This would strengthen federal institutio­ns and provide for better representa­tion of every region of the country.

Such a platform, however, will only succeed if the Conservati­ve Party represents the interests of all its members and, ultimately, the majority of Canadians.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada