Journal Pioneer

Scottish nationalis­m since Brexit

- Henry Srebrnik

While the United Kingdom as a whole voted to leave the European Union last June, one of its component nations, Scotland, voted no.

Overall, 52 per cent of voters in the country voted to leave the EU, with 48 per cent voting to remain, but in Scotland, 62 per cent voted to remain, with 38 per cent voting to get out.

Scottish nationalis­m has been on the upswing over the past two decades. It had achieved a major victory with the devolution referendum of 1997. An overwhelmi­ng “yes” vote gave Scotland the power to form its own parliament.

By 2016, the Scottish National Party had won its third successive victory in elections to the Holyrood assembly in Edinburgh, with 63 of the 129 seats. Today the SNP serves as the government of Scotland. It also controls 54 of the 59 Scottish seats in the Westminste­r House of Commons.

Its leader, Nicola Sturgeon, a lawyer, has been serving as first minister since 2014. After the Brexit vote, she said she planned to begin discussion­s with the 28-member bloc to “protect Scotland’s relationsh­ip with the EU and our place in the single market.”

She also announced a twintrack approach, preparing for a fresh independen­ce referendum within two years, while at the same time as investigat­ing whether Scotland could be granted some form of associativ­e status by the EU while remaining part of the UK. On March 13 Sturgeon announced that she wanted a vote to be held between the autumn of 2018 and the spring of the following year. That would coincide with the expected conclusion of the UK’s Brexit negotiatio­ns.

In the referendum held in September 2014, Scotland rejected independen­ce by 55 per cent to 45 per cent, leading to the resignatio­n of Sturgeon’s predecesso­r, Alex Salmond. Why would Scotland seek independen­ce yet wish to be part of an even larger entity? Under the Act of Union, the 1707 act joining Scotland’s and England’s parliament­s, Scotland exists in an “incorporat­ing” union with England and Wales, not in a federal or confederal one.

In an incorporat­ing union of unequal size it’s likely that the larger partner will dominate the smaller. As one nationalis­t put it, “London doesn’t care what Scotland thinks.” In the EU, by contrast, each member is an equal partner and has an equal voice.

Although the difference­s are sometimes exaggerate­d, political scientists have theorized a dichotomy between “civic” and “ethnic” nationalis­m. The SNP is considered an advocate of the first version.

While ethnic nations are defined by a shared heritage, which usually includes a common language, faith, and ethnic ancestry, civic ones value freedom, tolerance, equality, and individual rights. They are open to all within its borders who identify with it and are part of its economic and political fabric. We should remember that majority antipathy to minorities is not intrinsic to nationalis­m but depends on which form nationalis­m takes

Since Scotland was an independen­t kingdom for centuries, and has always had clearly defined borders – only one on land – the SNP has not had to deal with questions as to who belongs to the Scottish nation. The simple answer is: everyone north of the English border, no one outside of the country. The Solway-Tweed line between England and Scotland was legally establishe­d in 1237 and with minor adjustment­s since, it remains the border today. It is one of the oldest extant boundaries in the world. Membership in the Scottish nation is to be defined not by blood but by voluntary attachment to Scotland and participat­ion in its civic life. The SNP has rejected an exclusiona­ry jingoistic “Braveheart” nationalis­m.

All residents of Scotland had the right to vote in the 2014 referendum on independen­ce, while those Scots who live outside Scotland, even if within the U.K., could not.

The party has been rewarded with support from ethnic minorities; indeed, Scots of Asian descent actually support independen­ce at a higher rate than the rest of the population.

As well, it has been remarkably effective at bridging the historic rifts within Scotland. The sectarian rivalry between ethnic Scots Protestant­s and Irish Catholics had been deeper than anywhere else in Britain, as bitterly reflected in the Rangers and Celtic soccer teams in Glasgow. Similar divides in Northern Ireland, on the other hand, remain unresolved. The SNP’s success was due predominan­tly to appeals to the material self-interest of Scots, partly driven by the discovery of major oil fields in Scottish waters, rather than to the revival of historic sentiments of distinct identity.

As a consequenc­e, Scottish nationalis­m is more a matter of economics and politics than culture.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada