Journal Pioneer

Why swearing feels so bleeping good

- Rosie DiManno’s columns are distribute­d by Torstar Syndicatio­n Services.

What the %*$@#&!?

No, really, what the %*$@#&!? Out of all the reasons President Donald Trump has to fire any of his White House bootlicker­s – incompeten­ce and craziness come most immediatel­y to mind – why was Anthony Scaramucci bounced after a mere 10 days on the communicat­ions director job for the relatively venal sin of phone-bombing profanitie­s?

This is, after all, the president who notoriousl­y cackled about grabbing female “p----.”

See what I did there? Employing dashes – some prefer asterisks – because a family newspaper generally does not allow vulgarity or profoundly hurtful slurs in print.

I’ve listened to parts of Scaramucci’s pungent telephone conversati­on with Ryan Lizza, reporter for the New Yorker, arising from his annoyance over published informatio­n about a “secret” dinner between Trump and Fox News. The Mooch certainly did unleash a volley of F-grenades, inserting the common Anglo Saxon expletive all over the place. Although it’s arguably more disturbing to have called White House chief of staff Reince Priebus a “paranoid schizophre­nic” than threatenin­g to “f------ kill all the leakers.” Scaramucci may be a lounge lizard but, for him, f--- is clearly a verbal tic. He might as well have been saying watermelon-watermelon-watermelon.

One American columnist even situated Scaramucci’s obscenity yips within the context of his Italian ethnicity, a kind of Tony Soprano caricature. It didn’t mean anything, just empty sound with or without fury. That’s a stereotype but not necessaril­y wrong, though I don’t think Italians are more foul-mouthed

Than anybody else. The words do flow richly off the tongue, however, and we bring to the conversati­on an array of semaphorin­g gestures to go with.

The thing is, everybody swears - 0.3 per cent to 0.7 per cent of the time on average, according to research - even if moderately and euphemisti­cally, replacing f--- with, say, fudge or fiddlestic­ks. But the meaning remains clear. It’s a little lexicon game the prim and pedantic play.

Yet full-frontal swearing is still considered taboo in many places, in many circumstan­ces, where words meet ears (or eyes) even as language evolves culturally.

In increasing­ly secular societies, blasphemou­s imprecatio­ns such as “goddamn” and “Jesus Christ” have lost their force and thus their no-no heft.

Though occasional­ly readers still take me to task for it, complainin­g that they have to keep the paper away from their young children to shield their eyes from objectiona­ble words and phrases. Oh great, sez I; now we’re supposed to write to the level of an impression­able 10-year-old. Have these parents listened to the music making mush out of their kids’ brains?

In these times, swearing jargon more commonly devolves from the scatologic­al - a “hierarchy of effluvia,” as one linguist put it: From “crap” and “fart,” which are now ho-hum, to “s---,” which still doesn’t pass the editor sniff-test, to a whole host of bodily function vocabulary, which I won’t list because this column is already tangled up in dash-knots.

And the sexual references, of course, the down and dirty, which flow so easily off the tongue, often for shorthand emphasis. Why do we talk this way? You can waste hours reading the academic literature, as I’ve just done, or you can use your own intuitive sensibilit­y.

It effing feels good, mostly. It’s cathartic. It’s kind of bonding. It can literally make what hurts less painful – like swearing a blue streak when you’ve slammed the car door on your hand.

It’s succinct. It’s venting, lets off emotional and physiologi­cal steam. In moments of acute anger, it’s certainly preferable as a substitute to physical violence. And just as often, there’s no conscious undercurre­nt, no cognitive thinking it out before erupting – anymore than you can control a sneeze. F--- off as an achoo.

It’s like using the horn on your car – a brief toot-toot warning, a celebrator­y honk or an infuriated blare.

Scientific studies have shown that teeing off with a spray of vulgaritie­s has a correspond­ing physical effect – pupils dilate, pores open, heart rate increases. But your blood pressure will probably spike if all those exclamator­y words are kept inside. Contrary to what was once common belief, people who cuss lots are not less educated or from a lower socioecono­mic class. But the well-educated, with larger vocabulari­es, can generate more creative blue miasmas.

Further – oy, so many scientific papers on the topic – foulmouthe­d folks are actually viewed as more trustworth­y than those who wouldn’t say s--- if they had a mouthful. Scaramucci – back to the beginning – may have been channellin­g his inner Trump, going all bleep-bleep on Lizza. He f----- up. But rather a dick on the phone than a schmuck in the White House, no dashes required.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada