NEW TRIAL SET FOR COUPLE CONVICTED IN SON’S DEATH.
A couple who had been convicted in the meningitis death of their son say they have been vindicated by the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision to order a new trial.
David Stephan and his wife, Collet, were found guilty in 2016 of failing to provide the necessaries of life to 19-month-old Ezekiel.
Their trial in Lethbridge, Alta., heard evidence that they treated the boy with garlic, onion and horseradish rather than take him to a doctor. The Stephans eventually called 911 but the toddler died in hospital in 2012.
“We’re grateful because this is a move in the right direction and we now have the opportunity to bring the whole truth forward,’’ Stephan said outside the Supreme Court on Tuesday. “We’re just so excited to have the ability to do that and to be able to uphold parental rights here in Canada.’’ The Supreme Court heard arguments from the couple’s lawyer and the Crown before making the unusual move of ruling immediately from the bench.
Justice Michael Moldaver, speaking for the high court, said the trial judge did not properly instruct jurors on what would be a marked departure from reasonable behaviour “in a way that the jury could understand.’’ “Accordingly we would allow the appeal, quash the convictions and order a new trial.’’
Karen Molle, lawyer for the Stephans, had argued the trial judge didn’t instruct the jury properly to determine whether the Stephans acted differently than other reasonable parents.
“This jury charge gave this jury little choice but to convict,’’ Molle said.
Julie Morgan, representing the Crown, said the trial judge’s language was generalized but it was enough for the jury to understand the case. “The jury would have understood what their job was,’’ she told the court. “They found that the appellants did not meet the community standard, when they failed to take their child to a doctor when he had meningitis, and that endangered his life.’’
The Alberta Court of Appeal upheld the conviction last November, but because the ruling wasn’t unanimous, the couple had an automatic right to take their case to the Supreme Court.