Crown cautions against mistrial

CROWN URGES VADER JUDGE NOT TO DECLARE MISTRIAL, CAN FIX ERROR IN MURDER VERDICT

A Crown lawyer says the judge who used an outdated section of the Criminal Code in a murder verdict can fix the mistake — and one option would be finding Travis Vader guilty of manslaughter instead.

Court of Queen’s Bench Justice Denny Thomas last month convicted Vader of seconddegree murder in the deaths of Lyle and Marie McCann.

The couple, in their late 70s, disappeared after setting out from their Edmonton-area home to go camping in British Columbia in 2010. Their bodies have never been found. In finding Vader guilty, Thomas said Vader was a desperate drug addict who came across the couple in their motorhome and shot them during a robbery.

But the judge used Section 230 of the Criminal Code, which the Supreme Court declared unconstitutional in 1990.

Law experts have said a judge has never before cited the old section in a verdict — and the error is huge.

“The court may address the error,” Crown prosecutor Ashley Finlayson said in a brief in response to a defence application for a mistrial in the case.

“A mistrial should be declared only in the clearest of cases ... and the Crown submits that this is not one of them as other remedies are available.”

He said the judge could use a different section of the Criminal Code — 229 — and, with more analysis, still find Vader guilty of second-degree murder. But Thomas could also convict Vader of the lesser and included offence of manslaughter, Finlayson said.

Lawyers are to present oral arguments on the mistrial application in court Monday.

It’s not known when Thomas will make a decision.