Lethbridge Herald

Canadian teams in tough

CP PICKS: NO LIKELY CANADIAN CUP WINNER, BUT FIRST-ROUND VICTORIES POSSIBLE

- Jonas Siegel THE CANADIAN PRESS

Ayear after Canadian teams were shut out of the NHL playoffs, five are poised to battle for the Stanley Cup in 2017. And while it’s unlikely any of them will hoist the trophy, a few might just have enough to get by the first round of the post-season. Here are CP’s picks:

EASTERN CONFERENCE WASHINGTON VS. TORONTO

Pick: Capitals in six. Why: One team is just trying to gain some playoff experience while the other chases a first Stanley Cup. The Washington Capitals are the latter and while heavy pressure rests on their shoulders, their depth and experience should help them prevail over the young Leafs. About half of Toronto’s likely Game 1 lineup will be experienci­ng playoff hockey for the first time and how exactly they respond is a mystery, even to head coach Mike Babcock. The Leafs have plenty of high-end skill with Auston Matthews, Mitch Marner and William Nylander, but the Caps are deep up front, too, with Alex Ovechkin, T.J. Oshie, Evgeny Kuznetsov, Justin Williams and the always-overlooked Nicklas Backstrom. Washington also has maybe the best all-around group of defenders, excellent special teams and one of the league’s three best goalies in Braden Holtby.

OTTAWA VS. BOSTON

Pick: Senators in seven. Why: The Sens have defied the odds all season long and while far from a sure thing, they’re the pick in a close series that could probably go either way. Ottawa has adopted and somehow succeeded under Guy Boucher’s strict defensive posture. Goaltendin­g plays a big part in that and Craig Anderson will need to remain in fine form following a stellar regular season. The Bruins are probably the better team, scoring in bunches under interim coach Bruce Cassidy, while boasting league-best puck possession numbers, a top-ranked penalty kill, and a top-10 power play. Ottawa, conversely, had bottom-10 special teams and finished 22nd in possession. But the Sens won all four meetings this season.

MONTREAL vs. NEW YORK

Pick: Canadiens in six. Why: The Rangers have sputtered into the post-season, are the weakest puck possession squad in the playoffs and have an aging, uncertain option in goal with Henrik Lundqvist. The 35-year-old had his worst NHL season, posting a .910 save percentage in 57 games. He also has awful career numbers against Montreal (.898 save percentage in 35 games) and struggled badly in last year’s playoffs. Can he outperform Carey Price at this point in his career? Seems unlikely, especially given how well the 29-year-old has performed in his career against the Rangers (.940 save percentage) and how he finished the season.

PITTSBURGH VS. COLUMBUS

Pick: Penguins in five. Why: It’s a battle of speed versus big and heavy and the pick here is that the former wins out. The reigning champs were battered by injury all season long and yet finished with more goals than anyone and the secondbest record behind Washington. They’re starting to get healthy, too, with Evgeni Malkin and Olli Maatta both inching toward returns. Columbus had a terrific regular season — fuelled by goaltendin­g and a scorching power play in the first half — but struggled down the stretch in dropping six of their last seven. Their scariest offensive weapons slowed, too, with breakout star Cam Atkinson mustering only nine points in the last 21. Can he, Brandon Saad, Nick Foligno and the skilled Alexander Wennberg find another gear for the playoffs? Do they have enough to compete with Sidney Crosby, Malkin and the Penguins’ deep, high-powered attack? One X-factor: Sergei Bobrovsky, the best goalie in the league this season and someone who could certainly steal a series.

—-

WESTERN CONFERENCE CHICAGO VS. NASHVILLE

Pick: Blackhawks in five. Why: The Hawks lost in the first round last year after winning the Cup in 2015, but they’ve reloaded and appear ready for another deep run this spring. What makes them so alluring yet again is refreshed depth up front beyond Patrick Kane, Jonathan Toews, Marian Hossa and Artemi Panarin. Richard Panik (22 goals), Nick Schmaltz, Ryan Hartman (19 goals) have all blossomed this year in supporting roles and it’s that depth advantage that makes Chicago the pick here. Nashville is quick, though, has a scary first line — with Ryan Johansen between the Swedish pair of Filip Forsberg and Viktor Arvidsson — and a top-four on defence that’s as good as anyone. Pekka Rinne also finished well in goal. But the Hawks just have more talent.

MINNESOTA VS. ST. LOUIS

Pick: Wild in six. Why: The Blues just aren’t the same team that went to the Western Conference final last year. They parted with former captain David Backes in the off-season, traded Kevin Shattenkir­k at the deadline, lost Robby Fabbri to a season-ending injury, fired Ken Hitchcock mid-season and are currently without Paul Stastny. They did finish strong, boast one of the league’s scariest goal-scorers in Vladimir Tarasenko and have Jake Allen playing as well as ever between the pipes. Devan Dubnyk struggled in the second half, but here’s betting that he recovers and the Wild depth and quality special teams prove the difference.

ANAHEIM VS. CALGARY

Pick: Ducks in six. Why: Anaheim beat Calgary in five games in the second round of the playoffs two years ago, but these Flames are better now than they were then, from improvemen­ts on defence (think Dougie Hamilton), to coach (Glen Gulutzan) to young talent (Matthew Tkachuk) and ever-emerging stars like Sean Monahan, Johnny Gaudreau and Mikael Backlund. The Ducks are still the superior team though, a well-rounded entity with dark-horse Cup potential. Monahan and Gaudreau fared OK in matchups against Ryan Kesler this season, but how will the Backlund-led second unit fare against Getzlaf? And beyond that, against Corey Perry, the rising Rickard Rakell, Jakub Silfverber­g, and Patrick Eaves, who set a career-high with 33 goals? The Ducks are deep on the back end, too (though Cam Fowler is currently out) and won four of five matchups with the Flames during the regular season.

EDMONTON VS. SAN JOSE

Pick: Oilers in six. Why: To some surprise, the Sharks marched to the Stanley Cup final last spring. But this group — mostly the same with a couple tweaks — feels like a little creakier and without the required gas for another deep run. San Jose sputtered into the playoffs, dropping nine of their last 13. Injuries only fuel those concerns. Joe Thornton is hurt (though expected to be ready for Game 1) and coming off his least productive season since 1999, and perhaps of greater importance, Logan Couture is sidelined and uncertain to return anytime soon. San Jose’s next wave hasn’t yet emerged. The Oilers, by contrast, are young and full of pop. Captain Connor McDavid just finished one of the finer sophomore seasons in league history and Leon Draisaitl is emerging as a viable threat himself at age 21. Without Couture potentiall­y, can the Sharks slow McDavid? Do they have enough left to get by a team that’s playing in the post-season for the first time in a decade? The betting here is that youth will rise.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada