Canada lacks peacekeeping criteria
There are growing signs that Canada won’t meet the criteria for attending a November peacekeeping summit in Vancouver, even though it is the host country.
The price of admission is clear in leaked UN documents obtained by The Canadian Press: Defence ministers attending must be ready to pledge specific forces to the UN, if they haven’t already done so.
Canada has yet to make any definite pledge, despite being the host of this year’s summit, and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau wouldn’t commit Wednesday to a decision before mid-November.
The uncertainty over Canada’s plans before the meeting has prompted renewed frustration and disappointment from the UN and various allies, some of whom are losing faith in the Liberal government’s promise to support peacekeeping.
The UN documents lay out the overarching agenda and goals of the defence ministers’ two-day meeting, which starts Nov. 14.
Those include looking at ways to better prevent conflict, protect civilians and ensure soldiers and police officers on peacekeeping missions are well trained.
The summit will also put a heavy emphasis on increasing the number of female peacekeepers and incorporating gender perspectives into operations.
Yet the real focus of the meeting will be on taking stock of the specific pledges those countries in attendance will have already made, or are prepared to make, to UN peacekeeping operations.
That is why participation in the summit, the third of its kind after the inaugural event in Washington in 2015 and last year’s meeting in London, is only open to those countries that have made pledges.
“The participants of the 2017 ministerial will be defence ministers from all member states that have pledged and progressed capabilities — or that are ready to make a new pledge,” the document says.
It goes on to detail the specific equipment and troops that the UN needs for various missions, with “critical gaps” in the peacekeeping missions in Mali, South Sudan and Haiti.
Trudeau said Wednesday that Canadians expect his government to take its time before sending troops in harm’s way and he wouldn’t commit to a decision before the time of the Vancouver meeting.