Pro-choicers not open to others having a choice

So many are missing the point in this Harder incident. Whether she was pro-life or pro-choice, that is a choice. Her views had to be in the minority, as Trudeau’s Liberal MPs are not even allowed a personal choice. They had to be pro-choice or they weren’t allowed to run.

If she was chair, she would have put forth her platform on abortion; the rest of the pro-choice committee could shoot it down. Her voice there was an overwhelming minority, yet still makes many insecure! How pathetic. Obviously, our MP here should have no choice either, according to many of you, and you tread on many of us who support her point of view.

I’ll state this much: when I voted for Harder, I saw a great platform, hard worker, intelligence, the ability to think and react quickly, youth and thought she was the best for the job. Her pro-life stance was a bonus for me, but I realized it meant little when even pro-life Harper bowed to the pro-choice movement, and did nothing. You’re willing to trash this amazing young woman because she doesn’t represent your views in one area?

Scheer had proved Lethbridge made the right choice for their MP, as she had been chosen for this committee. I think that Scheer thought it was safe putting this young, smart female from his caucus in a position where she was the only one who would represent the pro-life view. I guess that was too much for the Liberals to handle, and now many from Lethbridge. You are making a mockery of our rights and freedoms.

Jill Skriver

Lethbridge