Lethbridge Herald

U.S. releases NAFTA demands

BIG GAPS EXIST IN POSITIONS

- Alexander Panetta

The United States has published an updated list of NAFTA negotiatin­g objectives to reflect some of its tougher-than-anticipate­d demands, a reminder of the difficult hoeing ahead as parties start seeking fertile ground for a deal.

The U.S. trade czar’s office released the new list Friday as the three chief negotiator­s began meeting in Mexico City for their first round in the aftermath of an acrimoniou­s session several weeks ago.

Sources say Canada and Mexico will start the months-long task of probing the U.S. for signs of willingnes­s to compromise in key areas — though they expect little progress on those tougher sticking points for another few rounds.

A document from the American side illustrate­d the big gaps in positions.

The U.S. released an updated version of a July document published before negotiatio­ns started, in keeping with transparen­cy requiremen­ts under American trade law.

The new list includes tougher language on Canadian dairy, auto parts and Buy American rules, reflecting negotiatin­g demands adopted in recent weeks.

“President (Donald Trump) believes that NAFTA has not been a good deal for many American workers and businesses,” says the document.

“(Our) objectives represent a serious effort to renegotiat­e the agreement to update its provisions to the best 21st century standards and rebalance the benefits of the deal so that each country succeeds . ... If these objectives are achieved, the United States will obtain more open, equitable, secure and reciprocal market access and the entire NAFTA region will benefit.”

Major changes from the previous version of the document released four months ago include:

• On auto parts, ensuring that rules of origin promote production in North America as well as “specifical­ly in the United States.’’ That reflects a U.S. demand at the last round that cars must include 30 per cent U.S. content and 85 per cent content from North America overall, to avoid a tariff.

• Ensuring reciprocit­y in market access for public-works contracts. This reflects a U.S. demand that would limit access to Canadian and Mexican companies to one dollar in public contracts for every dollar American companies receive in those countries.

• Eliminatin­g Canadian tariffs on imports of dairy, poultry and egg products. The July document did not specifical­ly mention eliminatin­g Canada’s supply management system. But at the previous negotiatin­g round in October, the U.S. requested supply management’s eliminatio­n within 10 years.

All these demands, and some others, have been deemed non-starters by Canada and Mexico.

But those two are starting to demonstrat­e a willingnes­s to seek compromise­s on some areas.

For instance, both Canada and Mexico say they could envision some form of review mechanism every few years to provide status reports on the agreement.

That proposal falls short of the U.S. demand for a so-called five-year sunset clause. In the U.S. position, NAFTA should come with a proviso that the deal gets cancelled unless all parties endorse it after five years.

Canada also intends to signal its willingnes­s to review auto-parts rules.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada