Lethbridge Herald

Ad Standards upholds ruling against anti-abortion ads on City buses, benches

ADS CONTAINED ‘UNACCEPTAB­LE DEPICTIONS AND PORTRAYALS’

- Nick Kuhl nkuhl@lethbridge­herald.com

Advertisin­g Standards Canada (Ad Standards) has ruled that advertisem­ents in Lethbridge earlier this year — a series of controvers­ial anti-abortion advertisem­ents on City buses, bus shelters and benches — contained “unacceptab­le depictions and portrayals.”

One of the key figures in the ad opposition, Miranda Hlady, confirmed the news in an email to media Wednesday afternoon, which contained the full statement from Ad Standards.

“Advertisin­g Standards Canada (Ad Standards) received your complaint alleging that the above referenced advertisem­ent contravene­d the Canadian Code of Advertisin­g Standards (Code),” it reads.

“The Standards Council (Council) met on May 24, 2018, to consider this complaint. Council includes representa­tives from advertiser­s, advertisin­g agencies, the media and the public, all of whom volunteer their time to participat­e in this complaint review process. Council reviewed the complaint and the advertisem­ent under Clause 1 (Accuracy and Clarity) and Clause 14 (Unacceptab­le Depictions and Portrayals) of the Code.

“Dominating the advertisem­ent was the image of a well-developed and mature-looking foetus. To the members of Council, this image clearly appeared to be more representa­tive of a foetus not in its early stages of developmen­t but at a later stage of gestation when abortions are, typically, not performed or permitted. The words accompanyi­ng the images of the foetus were “Preborn Babies Feel Pain. Say No to Abortion.” One of the principle impression­s conveyed to Council by the combinatio­n of the words and images in this advertisem­ent was that this image is representa­tive of foetuses when they are aborted (an inaccurate and misleading representa­tion, contrary to Clause 1 (a) of the Code; and that all foetuses at all stages of gestation will feel pain if the pregnancy is aborted.”

On April 4, the City of Lethbridge announced it would be pulling the series of controvers­ial advertisem­ents from city buses, bus shelters and benches after receiving heated feedback from various community members.

“After reviewing comments from city residents,” read the statement announcing the decision, “the City of Lethbridge has made an administra­tive decision to remove the advertisem­ents due to adverse community reaction. The advertisin­g contractor has been notified of this decision and has confirmed that the ads will be removed from buses by Thursday morning, April 5, as well as from bus benches and shelters by this weekend.”

Mayor Chris Spearman said at that time the City was reviewing its ad policy in the face of opposition.

“We acknowledg­e that advertisin­g on public spaces must meet community norms, and that sometimes there can be a range of values and views,” the City’s April statement read. “The best interests of our community are always paramount, and we will continue to exert discretion in the use of all public advertisin­g spaces.”

 ?? Herald file photo by Ian Martens ?? Advertisin­g Standards Canada has ruled the Lethbridge Pro-Life advertisem­ents that were on display on City buses, bus shelters and benches earlier this year contained “unacceptab­le depictions and portrayals.” @IMartensHe­rald
Herald file photo by Ian Martens Advertisin­g Standards Canada has ruled the Lethbridge Pro-Life advertisem­ents that were on display on City buses, bus shelters and benches earlier this year contained “unacceptab­le depictions and portrayals.” @IMartensHe­rald

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada