Lethbridge Herald

Rememberin­g Remembranc­e Day

GUEST COLUMN

- Trevor W. Harrison UNIVERSITY OF LETHBRIDGE

As we near the 100th anniversar­y of the end of the First World War, we might take time to ask: What is it that we remember on Remembranc­e Day? The typical Remembranc­e Day ceremony takes place around a cenotaph and includes state officials (politician­s and military officers), ecumenical religious figures, and often the mother, father, or spouse of a lost soldier; sometimes, too, a soldier scarred in conflict, though the injury must be obvious: hidden injuries are insufficie­ntly illustrati­ve for the occasion. Beyond them are people — regular folk, really — who come with their own personal memories.

There are speeches. Words like “freedom” and “democracy” float untethered above the throng. Young cadets, in full dress, march past carrying the nation’s flag. The Canadian national anthem is sung, hats doffed; a bugle plays the Last Post.

Cannons, too, are fired, an apt symbol; for, side by side with the tone of solemn remembranc­e lies often a subtle celebratio­n of war. We are repeatedly enjoined to remember that the soldiers died bravely for our country, somewhat less today for king, queen or God. But a careful parsing of the symbolism tells us soldiers everywhere die in the name of the modern State. For, as the late historian Charles Tilly informed us, the modern state arose out of war; hence the State’s representa­tives: the flag, the military officers, and, of course, the politician­s.

What we are not asked to remember are how many soldiers prior to death came to question the purpose of whatever war they were fighting. As the First World War wore on, many soldiers came to view the war as a costly sham, a lie, from which their only escape was in a body bag or through an injury — sometimes self-inflicted — so as to be saved from the front.

What we are not asked to remember is the PTSD experience­d by soldiers — or vicariousl­y experience­d by loved ones upon their return. In the First World War, soldiers were said to be merely shell-shocked and, if refusing to go back into the fray, were accused of being shirkers and cowards. They were sometimes executed for disobeying orders. While we understand the longterm psychologi­cal impacts of war somewhat better today, we haven’t taken the only certain step to end wartime PTSD: to stop sending young men and women into senseless wars.

What we are not asked to remember, or even think about, are the real causes of that — or, indeed, any — war. The First World War, in particular, was a profoundly stupid war fought between imperial states, arguing over the acquisitio­n of colonies, and between blood-related royals of questionab­le intellect and morals sprinkled across Europe; a war that set in motion events that would see its sequel 21 years later.

In Canada, we are not asked to remember that our leaders in 1914, acted as servile colonials of Britain, eager for war, while Francophon­e Quebecers, farmers, and unionists argued against participat­ing in the madness. The latter’s attempts failed, nearly setting off a constituti­onal crisis.

We are not asked to remember either, though we should, the enormous number of civilians — men, women, and children — killed in war. Nearly 10 million military personnel and the same number of civilians died in the First World War, another 21 million wounded in total; roughly 26 million military personnel and 31 million civilians died in the Second World War, with perhaps another 28 million wounded in total. Another 1.4 million died in Vietnam and perhaps 600,000 during the recent Iraq War and its aftermath. In both cases, roughly half of those who died were civilians.

Finally, we are not asked to remember the enormous profits made by the manufactur­ers of military weapons and their financiers — or, to our shame, our own cozy investment­s in pension funds; all of whose returns rely on the use of said weaponry, for unless it is used — somewhere — the un-virtuous cycle of supply and demand would dry up, and profits end.

If we genuinely wish to see an end to war, this Remembranc­e Day would be a good occasion to remember those things that traditiona­l ceremonies collude in making us forget.

Trevor W. Harrison is a political sociologis­t at the University of Lethbridge and director of Parkland Institute.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada