Lethbridge Herald

U.S. farm bill deal reached

FARM BILL DEAL SCRAPS NEW WORK REQUIREMEN­TS FOR FOOD STAMPS

- Matthew Daly and Juliet Linderman THE ASSOCIATED PRESS — WASHINGTON

Abipartisa­n deal on the multi-billion dollar farm bill would scrap new work requiremen­ts for some older food stamp recipients — rejecting a plan backed by House Republican­s and President Donald Trump.

Lawmakers expect to vote next week on the tentative deal, announced Thursday by House and Senate negotiator­s.

Democrats and many Senate Republican­s opposed the work requiremen­ts, which became the biggest stumbling block to an agreement on the farm bill. The legislatio­n sets federal agricultur­al and food policy for five years and provides more than $400 billion in farm subsidies, conservati­on programs and food aid for the poor.

In a statement Thursday, House and Senate agricultur­e committee leaders from both parties said they had reached an agreement in principle but were working to finalize the bill’s language and costs.

“We still have more work to do. We are committed to delivering a new farm bill to America as quickly as possible,” said the statement by Sens. Pat Roberts, R-Kan., and Debbie Stabenow, DMich., and Reps. Mike Conaway, R-Texas, and Collin Peterson, D-Minn.

Roberts and Conaway chair the Senate and House Agricultur­e committees, respective­ly, while Stabenow and Peterson are the top Democrats.

Rep. Mark Walker, a North Carolina Republican who leads a group of House conservati­ves, said he was disappoint­ed that the bill appears to leave out the new work requiremen­ts, a top priority for many House Republican­s and Trump.

“House conservati­ves, the president and the vast majority of Americans support policies that encourage work and help lift people out of poverty,” Walker said on Twitter. “As I’ve said for months, those provisions have to stay” in the bill.

Work requiremen­ts for food stamps, known as the Supplement­al Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, were included in a bill that narrowly passed the House with no Democratic votes. A bipartisan version that won easy Senate approval did not include the requiremen­ts, and few Senate Republican­s want them.

With the midterm elections turning control of the House over to Democrats, pressure increased on House Republican­s to pass a compromise during the lameduck session rather than start over in a Democratic­controlled chamber where the GOP was likely to suffer even greater policy losses.

The House passed its version of the farm bill in June on its second attempt, after a group of GOP lawmakers initially scuttled passage over an unrelated immigratio­n issue.

Currently, able-bodied adults ages 18-49 without children are required to work 20 hours a week to maintain their SNAP benefits. The House bill raises the age of recipients subject to work requiremen­ts from 49 to 59 and requires parents with children older than 6 to work or participat­e in job training.

The House measure also limits circumstan­ces under which families who qualify for other poverty programs can automatica­lly be eligible for SNAP, and earmarks $1 billion to expand work training programs. By contrast, the bipartisan Senate bill offers modest adjustment­s to existing farm programs and makes no changes to SNAP.

Earlier this year, Trump signed an executive order directing federal agencies to enforce existing work requiremen­ts and review all programs, waivers and exemptions. Throughout the negotiatio­n process Trump has made clear he supports work requiremen­ts, tweeting about the issue multiple times.

The two chambers also clashed over portions of the forestry and conservati­on titles of the bill. Negotiatio­ns were further complicate­d in recent days when the White House asked Congress to make changes to the forestry title in response to deadly wildfires in California, giving more authority to the Agricultur­e and Interior department­s to clear forests and other public lands.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada