Lethbridge Herald

Mayor has issue with CTF report

REPORT SAYS LETHBRIDGE THIRD- HIGHEST SPENDER AMONG MID-SIZED CITIES IN PROVINCE

- Tim Kalinowski LETHBRIDGE HERALD tkalinowsk­i@lethbridge­herald.com

The Canadian Taxpayers’ Federation released a list of its biggest spending municipali­ties in Alberta in various categories earlier this week, and Lethbridge is in the top three, it says, among mid-sized jurisdicti­ons with over 30,000 in population.

According to the CTF the City of Lethbridge spends almost $4,000 annually per taxpayer in its jurisdicti­on, putting it third behind the City of Medicine Hat and the Regional Municipali­ty of Wood Buffalo.

The CTF report, echoing what the MacKinnon Blue Ribbon Panel reported last year, says Alberta municipali­ties as a whole spend more than equivalent-sized jurisdicti­ons in any other province besides Ontario.

Mayor Chris Spearman said the CTF report does not capture the full extent of the services Lethbridge offers residents, and devolves things down to a methodolog­y which seems to somehow suggest the lowest common denominato­r should be applied to all citizens and jurisdicti­ons in Alberta no matter their individual circumstan­ces or economic profiles.

“I think you have to look at those numbers with a little bit of foresight and analysis, and just don’t take them the way they are presented,” he said.

“We are third-highest among midsized cities, but we provide services other mid-sized cities don’t provide. For example, transit services. We have our own police service. Those are things that we’re looking at where we provide additional levels of service other municipali­ties don’t have.”

Spearman also pointed out the City has committed to a zero-per-cent tax increase this year, and is undertakin­g an extensive operationa­l review to find greater efficienci­es.

“We provide certain levels of service that we acknowledg­e are higher than the service levels that are available in other cities,” Spearman stated. “Is that appropriat­e? For example, we have twice as many Access-A-Ride riders as other cities. There is a cost to that, and if we scale it back how are those customers going to feel? We also maintain more facilities than most comparable municipali­ties, but the quality of our facilities is very high.”

On a related note, Spearman also responded to a letter released by ATU Local 987 transit union president Travis Oberg earlier this week where Oberg strongly objected on behalf of his members to the City ending school bus service for local school boards. He stated parents will pay more for school bus service once the changes take effect and busing responsibi­lities are handed off to a private transporta­tion company.

“Why are we funnelling taxpayer dollars to private corporatio­ns that are driven by profits?” Oberg asks in his letter. “This will hurt families in the long run as private firms want to see healthy profits, and this could open the door to a ‘pay for service model’ where families will have to pay more for their kids to get on the bus.”

Spearman said this issue represents the crux of the problem city council must deal with, and the balance of competing demands councillor­s face on a regular basis: the CTF says the City spends too much per taxpayer, and others like the transit union ask the City to continue to pay for services other jurisdicti­ons don’t.

“I just want to remind everybody the City of Lethbridge was the only city in Alberta that was providing school bus transporta­tion through yellow buses,” Spearman explained. “Again, that was another service we were providing, and another level of (public) employees. We are looking at doing things differentl­y, and not everybody is going to be happy with the changes we make.”

Follow @TimKalHera­ld on Twitter

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada