Lethbridge Herald

Court hands setback to Keystone

- Matthew Brown

The U.S. Supreme Court handed another setback to the Keystone XL oil sands pipeline from Canada on Monday by keeping in place a lower court ruling that blocked a key environmen­tal permit for the project.

Canadian company TC Energy needs the permit to continue building the long-disputed pipeline across U.S. rivers and streams. Without it, the project that has been heavily promoted by President Donald Trump faces more delay just as work on it had finally begun this year following years of courtroom battles.

Monday’s Supreme Court order also put on hold an earlier court ruling out of Montana as it pertains to other oil and gas pipelines across the nation.

That’s a sliver of good news for an industry that just suffered two other blows — Sunday’s cancellati­on of the $8-billion Atlantic Coast gas pipeline in the Southeast and a Monday ruling that shut down the Dakota Access oil pipeline in North Dakota.

In the Keystone case, an April ruling from U.S. District Judge Brian Morris in Montana had threatened to delay not just Keystone but more than 70 pipeline projects across the U.S., and add as much as $2 billion in costs, according to industry representa­tives.

Morris agreed with environmen­talists who contended a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers constructi­on permit program was allowing companies to skirt responsibi­lity for damage done to water bodies.

But the Trump administra­tion and industry attorneys argued the permit, in place since the 1970s, was functionin­g properly when it was cancelled by Morris over concerns about endangered species being harmed during pipeline constructi­on.

Monday’s one-paragraph order did not provide any rationale for the high court’s decision.

The corps suspended the program following Morris’ April ruling. Agency officials could not be immediatel­y reached for comment.

TC Energy spokesman Terry Cunha said the company is not giving up on Keystone, but it will have to delay large portions of the 1,200-mile (1,900kilomet­re) oilsands pipeline. The company started constructi­on last week on a 329-mile (530-kilometre) section of the line in Alberta. That work will continue while the company wages its court fight in the U.S.

An attorney for one of the environmen­tal groups involved in the case called Monday’s order a major victory in the fight against Keystone. But he acknowledg­ed the plaintiffs had hoped to hamper oil and gas projects nationwide.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada