Who are the authentic sources?
Dr. Trushar Patel, in the Dec 9 guest column “Understanding COVID vaccines,” did a fine job explaining them, informing that “we are looking at about 200 vaccines at different stages of development.” Further along Dr. Patel caused bells to ring — loud! — with these words: “at this stage, the long-term side effects of an mRNA vaccine aren’t known.”
He also urged readers to “stay away from conspiracy theories and false information,” recommending the CDC, WHO and the “Government of Canada” as “authentic sources” of information. What humour! So I’m a “conspiracy theorist” if I question authority or decisions made on my behalf, etc. — beautiful. Are we living in a democratic or a fascist state?
In October Dr. David Nabarro, WHO special envoy on COVID-19, told world leaders to “stop using lockdowns as a primary control method.” World “leaders” obviously are ignoring this “authentic source.” Canada’s own supreme authoritative light bulb on all things health told us “there was no evidence of human-to-human transmission,” and that “we shouldn’t close our borders to countries with high levels of infection.” Another completely incompetent “authentic source” I unwillingly pay to sling the bull.
Then there’s the failure of CDC, who Montana physician Dr. Annie Bukacek blew the whistle on after discovering they’d fudged COVID19 death figures, an intentional pursuit hinging on criminality. And on and on. There’s hundreds of highly accredited doctors ready and willing who’ve raised alarms — voices drowned by big pharma, and a bought media in the play eager to cash in on mass inoculation via a prescription, of which “long-term effects are not known.”
I’ll leave the quacks of the media, WHO, CDC and government pushers to their grand experiment, relying on practising health professionals with credentials over media-addicted talking heads for my information.
Suggested Goggling for more info is “Charlie Kirk — nine doctors speak out” and “I can’t keep doing this, doctor pleads for review of data during COVID-19 senate review.” These interviews will inform. They may even cause some to ponder if it’s wise to participate in a mass experiment of which long-term effects are an unknown!