Seattle Lyft, Uber drivers may unionize

SEATTLE For the second time this month, a federal judge has rejected a challenge to Seattle’s first-in-the-nation law allowing drivers of ridehailing companies such as Uber and Lyft to unionize over pay and working conditions.

U.S. District Judge Robert Lasnik late Thursday rejected a challenge brought by 11 drivers, saying that their claims against the law were premature or too speculative.

He earlier rejected a challenge brought by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce on behalf of the companies. The organization is appealing that decision. The National Right to Work Legal Defence Foundation, which represents the drivers, said Friday that it too would appeal.

But the judge declined to keep Seattle’s law on hold pending the appeals, clearing the way for the Teamsters to try to begin unionizing the drivers unless the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals says otherwise.

“The court recognized the public importance of maintaining and promoting the safety and reliability of the for-hire transportation industry in the City of Seattle, goals which this law advances,” Seattle City Attorney Pete Holmes said in a written statement Friday.

The 2015 law requires companies that hire or contract with drivers of taxis, for-hire transportation companies and appbased services to bargain with them if a majority show they want to be represented.

The drivers who sued to challenge the law argued that it conflicted with federal labour law as well as their right to free association. Lasnik disagreed, suggesting that any collective bargaining agreement could comport with labour law and the Constitution, and that their claims were thus premature.