Medicine Hat News

Turning a profit on pot should be the goal of Alberta gov’t

- Jeremy Appel (Jeremy Appel is a News reporter. To comment on this and other editorials, go to www.medicineha­tnews.com/opinions.)

Alberta Justice Minister Kathleen Ganley has announced the first details of Alberta’s plans for selling marijuana once the product is legalized across the nation in July.

This makes Alberta the third province, after Ontario and New Brunswick, to show its hand.

Ganley announced enough details to satisfy those who want to know Alberta’s broader approach to legalizati­on, while keeping more contentiou­s details, like who gets to sell it, for a later date.

Although Alberta Health Services recommende­d making the legal age 21 for pot consumptio­n and raising the alcohol and tobacco ages from 18 to match it, Alberta’s government is sensibly and simply making 18 the legal age for weed.

Since the stated goal of legalizati­on is to keep kids away from the black market, it wouldn’t make sense to force people between the ages of 18 and 21 to purchase weed illegally.

If you’re an 18-year-old who wants to toke up, you’re not going to be deterred from doing so if it will be legal in three years. Of course, Canadian teenagers have never been deterred from smoking pot, which is one of the reasons why it’s becoming legal in the first place.

This fixation on preventing black market sales doesn’t make much sense. Has anyone ever been murdered over a pot deal gone awry? This stands in contrast to other substances where violent behaviour and gangsteris­m are intimately connected with their sale.

It would appear that decriminal­ization, rather than full legalizati­on, would be the more rational course of action for a relatively harmless substance like marijuana.

But the prime minister made a vow to legalize and regulate marijuana sales, and to his credit he’s keeping that promise, unlike electoral reform and First Nations reconcilia­tion.

In the meantime, it would be helpful if marijuana possession were decriminal­ized, considerin­g it won’t be a crime come July, but this is outside of the province’s purview.

Alberta has yet to decide whether it will opt for Ontario’s much-maligned approach of establishi­ng government-run stores for marijuana or New Brunswick’s arms-length Crown corporatio­n.

The government is wisely waiting for further consultati­ons from residents before making a decision that will largely determine how much revenue it will generate and how accessible the product will be.

Even moreso than Ontario with its already-establishe­d Liquor Control Board, it would be quite wasteful for Alberta to set up government-run pot vendors because it would have to create the infrastruc­ture from scratch.

Ganley said the government’s immediate goal is to break even, not turn a profit, from weed sales.

But making money from the legalizati­on of marijuana would be to the NDP’s benefit.

It could be used to reduce the province’s growing debt while maintainin­g current levels of public services.

This would eliminate a major conservati­ve talking point that the current government is fiscally irresponsi­ble, saddling future generation­s with unsustaina­ble debt.

Colorado, in many ways a pioneer of marijuana legalizati­on, nets about $200 million a year in marijuana sales, according to a recent article in Macleans.

Sure, that’s not a massive sum considerin­g the state earns $24 billion in total revenues, but it’s a little something to go towards state coffers.

When you have crediting agencies and opposition parties breathing down your neck about deficits, as Alberta does, any bit of profit helps.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada