Medicine Hat News

Startups shook up the razor market. What’s next?

- ALEXANDRA OLSON

NEW YORK What do you hate shopping for? Toothpaste? Diaper rash cream? Sunscreen? The guys who founded Harry’s shaving club spend a lot time thinking about this question.

The startup, which took on razor giants Gillette and Schick with its direct-to-consumer subscripti­on model, has since expanded into traditiona­l retail and launched a line of body care products. Armed with $112 million in new financing to develop new brands, the company now is investigat­ing what other sleepy products might be ripe for disruption.

“Our vision is to build a next-generation consumer brand company,” said Jeff Raider, who recently took on the role of CEO of Harry’s Labs, overseeing the developmen­t of new brands. “It might be better products, a better experience getting the products or a brand that appeals to who they want to be as people.”

There’s a reason why Harry’s investors are betting that reinventin­g the razor was no flash-in-the-pan idea. Insurgent brands are shaking up the way people buy everything from mattresses to prescripti­on acne remedies, eating into the market share of big consumer product companies and leaving them scrambling to respond.

‘NO CATEGORY IS IMMUNE’

Eager venture capitalist­s, digital technology and social media make it easier for anyone with a good idea to enter the consumer goods market, according to a report on insurgent brands by Bain & Company, a management consulting firm. Contract manufactur­ing, which allows companies to outsource production and sometimes defray costs, also has made it simpler.

“The reality is that no category is immune to disruption,” the Bain & Company report said.

Digital newcomers still represent only a fraction of the overall market share, according to the report, which analyzed sales data from IRI market research firm for 90 goods categories. Startup brands accounted for only 2 per cent of market share across 45 product types they disrupted from 2012 to 2016, the report said. But such companies captured a quarter of the growth in that time.

Being small is often a tactical advantage, allowing fledgling companies the freedom to focus on a core product, shoring up visibility among a targeted group of consumers, while bigger brands are forced to defend their market share across a wider base.

Harry’s has captured about 2 per cent of the $2.8 billion men’s shaving industry since its launch in 2013, according to Euromonito­r market research firm. Its main shaving club rival, Dollar Shave Club, has about 8 per cent.

It’s been a gut punch to the industry leaders.

Gillette controlled about 70 per cent of the U.S. market a decade ago. Last year, its market share dropped to below 50 per cent, according to Euromonito­r. The company, owned by P&G, was forced to slash its razor prices by an average of 12 per cent last year. No. 2 razor maker Schick has also been squeezed. Parent company Edgewell Personal Care reported a 3.6 per cent drop in net sales from its North America shave business in its most recent earnings report.

Both major brands now offer subscripti­on services on their own direct-to-consumer sites, which they are leveraging to promote their lowerend razors while also showcasing their edge in technologi­cal innovation.

“Our blades are known for their long-lasting quality, which means you need less cartridges per year as compared to the other shave clubs in the market,” said Stephanie Lynn, vice-president of Global eCommerce for Edgewell.

Pankaj Bhalla, brand director of Gillette North America, said increasing its online sales is a “key part of our strategy.” He offers a reality check for the shave clubs: While Gillette might be new to the direct-to-consumer game, the brand says it has 70 per cent of the market share on online retailers like Amazon and Jet.com.

But critics say both incumbents were slow to respond to the new competitio­n. ‘WHAT UPSETS YOU?’ Like other insurgent companies, Harry’s and Dollar Shave Club took off because they tapped into shoppers’ grievances.

Casper’s, which lets customers try mattresses at home for 100 nights, grew out of the premise that it’s no fun shopping for a big, bulky item that’s hard to test out.

The start-up Hims, which counts Harry’s as a minority stakeholde­r, launched last year to give men a more comfortabl­e way to shop for hair growth and erectile dysfunctio­n drugs.

“What sets them apart is a compelling offer that addresses a real unmet consumer need,” said Bain & Company in its report.

Raider said he hopes to mine the 2 million interactio­ns Harry’s has had with customers to find more gripes.

On Facebook, Harry’s told one curious customer that shampoo and conditione­r are in the works.

Another possibilit­y? Sunscreen. Raider says it’s expensive and should be marketed for everyday use, not beach trips.

“A lot of just comes from talking to people, like, ‘hey, what do you want to be better in your life?’” Raider said. “What upsets you?”

They’re also not ruling out products to help men take care of beards.

“It will take time for us to understand those guys,” the clean-shaven Raider said. “Maybe Andy and I will have to grow big beards.”

“Our vision is to build a next-generation consumer brand company.” – Jeff Raider, CEO of Harry’s Labs

 ?? AP PHOTO/MARY ALTAFFER ?? In this June 2018, photo, co-founders and co-CEOs of Harry's Inc., Jeff Raider, left, and Andy Katz-Mayfield speak during an interview with The Associated Press at company headquarte­rs in New York. Armed with $112 million in new financing, the online startup that took on razor giants Gillette and Schick with its direct-to-consumer subscripti­on model is investigat­ing what other sleepy products might be ripe for disruption.
AP PHOTO/MARY ALTAFFER In this June 2018, photo, co-founders and co-CEOs of Harry's Inc., Jeff Raider, left, and Andy Katz-Mayfield speak during an interview with The Associated Press at company headquarte­rs in New York. Armed with $112 million in new financing, the online startup that took on razor giants Gillette and Schick with its direct-to-consumer subscripti­on model is investigat­ing what other sleepy products might be ripe for disruption.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada