Medicine Hat News

Government­s faced with trying to solve oilpatch’s problems

- Collin Gallant

An increasing­ly hostile campaign that accuses Eastern Canadians of supporting “dictator oil,” “terrorist oil” or worse is increasing­ly off-base and not helping win over average Canadians.

To be frank, your average Canadian doesn’t import any oil, doesn’t own a refinery and doesn’t have the financial resources to make a pipeline happen. Do you? Yet, politician­s, lobby groups and a variety of political actors claiming to be champions of the Alberta oil patch are increasing­ly pushing that message.

For the most part though, Eastern Canadians, who are most often the target, have little choice but to be served gasoline produced from world exports.

Their only part in the energy economy is to fill up at the pump or heat their home with what’s available to them. The logistics network, storage capacity, capitaliza­tion, refining, wholesale distributi­on and retailing are controlled by oil companies, who, for the most part, designed them exactly as they want them.

Pipelines have become an emotional issue, and a national issue beyond Western Canada.

No discussion is complete without addressing environmen­tal processes and stiff opposition from activists and some Indigenous groups. However, production has been steadily rising in Fort McMurray for decades. Lines followed but exclusivel­y ran north-south to the United States, where Canadian crude is discounted.

In the bonanza or bust oilpatch, companies are not particular­ly known for their foresight, but had world export capacity been a priority for the industry, one would assume it would have been suggested a decade or more ago.

The current issue is frustrated by cancelled projects and the most recent among many pauses on the TransMount­ain pipeline expansion project.

That line would carry Alberta oil to the west coast, world markets and a higher price for the betterment of everyone, it’s said. Sounds simple, right? Well, this spring, Pembina Pipeline shelved a relatively easy expansion of its Alliance natural gas line from Alberta to Chicago when not enough interest was garnered from producers. That’s despite a gaping price differenti­al between markets, and seemingly all the same arguments that make TransMount­ain such a win-winwinner.

Pipeline capacity and price differenti­al have been watchwords in political circles for years.

The Alberta government’s revenue is certainly affected, but whether this bothers major oil companies based in Houston, which control a major portion of Canadian production, remains unclear.

Now, it seems as though the Alberta New Democratic and federal Liberal government­s find themselves in the funny position of having to solve the oilpatch’s problem for them.

You’d be hard pressed to find a conservati­ve or Albertan, in general, calling for the sort of market control and ownership rules that were brought in during the Pierre Trudeau-era National Energy Plan.

Yet, that’s essentiall­y what is being called for when opposition politician­s and average citizens call oil companies to buy Canadian first, sell to Canadians first or force them to meld their business plans to accommodat­e a better deal for Canada.

Ottawa’s decision to buy out TransMount­ain and press the line forward itself in the face of obstructio­n by environmen­tal groups is explained differentl­y by different sides of the political spectrum.

All agree, however, it’s an extraordin­ary turn of events, especially in a sector of the economy whose standing request to government for the last 40 years has been “hands off.”

The current pipeline network in North America exists exactly how private companies have chosen to draw it.

That the Alberta government or Alberta public would prefer alternate routes to alternate markets is a separate concern, albeit perhaps the biggest concern facing the Western Canadian economy.

(Collin Gallant is a News reporter. To comment on this and other editorials, go to www.medicineha­tnews.com/opinions.)

Kudos to Chrystia Freeland who stood up to the U.S. and the man in the White House. Smiles are a sign of happiness. The U.S. president’s wife and young son and the rest of the family rarely smile. Why?

Tickled Pink

A big thank you to the kind lady in front of me who paid for my tea while I waited in line at the new Tim’s drive thru. It made my day. I will definitely pay it forward.

Ticked Off

Your columnist said Kavanaugh was accused of rape. Not true — it was sexual assault. Listen to both sides and then assassinat­e the guy with the truth. No, I won’t be cancelling my News subscripti­on because I value free speech too much.

Ticked Off

At people who think being a politician is easy. Try to get on city council, or the county, the province or the federal government. Trying to please the majority of people is not easy, so stop complainin­g.

Sure happy that city council turtled on their bylaw on pot. I’d like to invite every pot smoker to come down to city hall on the morning of Oct. 18 and have a pot-out in front of the place where the people have no guts.

Tickled Pink

The federal opposition leader moves his dimples and looks foolish again on NAFTA.

Ticked Off

At the two cowards who vandalized the rainbow crosswalk. Where is your pride? Show your face.

Tickled Pink

Kudos to the persons who dumped white paint on the “rainbow” sidewalk at MHC. I approve. Wondering when the “straight” sidewalk will be happening and where.

Tickled Pink

It is so wonderful that I flip the newspaper page from grumpy Ticked Offs and find a page of comics to cheer me up immensely.

Ticked Off

Rushing into legalizing marijuana is like buying a vehicle which you know is dangerous and could kill you before you even take it for a test drive.

Ticked Off

At the lazy excuse of a human who stole our rubber curb ramps!

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada