Montreal Gazette

Ottawa proposes new biosecurit­y regulation­s

Potentiall­y deadly microbes on government radar

- MARGARET MUNRO

In a bid to prevent potentiall­y deadly microbes like anthrax or SARS from getting loose in Canada, the federal government is proposing sweeping biosecurit­y regulation­s to govern pathogens found in about 8,500 laboratori­es across Canada.

Researcher­s working with particular­ly nasty micro-organisms and the toxins they produce will need licences and security clearance under the proposed regulation­s published in the Canada Gazette on Saturday.

The government says the regulation­s are designed to improve safety and oversight and bring Canada in line with countries like the U.S. to “improve the deterrent for persons with malicious intent.”

Researcher­s support the move to shore up Canada’s biosecurit­y but say much will depend on how the regulation­s are applied.

“The devil is in the details,” said Bob Hancock, who works with disease-causing microbes at the University of British Columbia.

The new regulation­s, in the works for years, would replace interim rules in place since the government passed the Human Pathogens and Toxins Act four years ago.

Under the proposed regulation­s, labs would need to assign biosafety officers and apply for licences good for one to five years depending on the pathogen.

Most of Canada’s 8,500 labs — at medical facilities, universiti­es and government operations — handle low- to moderate-risk organisms such as E. coli, salmonella or Listeria and will qualify for five-year licences.

Tighter oversight will be aimed at higher-risk organisms like the ones that cause SARS and tuberculos­is and even more deadly organisms like Ebola, Nipah and Marburg viruses that are restricted to highsecuri­ty laboratori­es.

The federal health minister is to be notified within 24 hours if a “security sensitive biological agent” is unexpected­ly delayed.

The government says its new “safety and security regime” will also improve the ability to track where pathogens and toxins are stored and used in the event of an emergency.

The risk is small, but releases — either accidental or deliberate — have the “potential to cause catastroph­ic consequenc­es,” says the preamble to the proposed regula- tions.

The government estimates it will cost labs across the country about $2.41 million to comply with the new rules, and $6.82 million for the federal government to administer the rules in the first year.

Hancock says close oversight of risky pathogens “is absolutely essential” for countries to maintain biosecurit­y.

“There is a level at which self-policing (by the academic and scientific community) isn’t sufficient and the government has to take responsibi­lity,” he said.

There has been concern in some academic quarters over which organisms fall into higher-risk categories. “People feel strongly about whether their organisms fit or not,” Hancock said.

The question of security clearances and criminal checks is also a concern.

 ?? AFP/GETTY IMAGES ?? The federal government is proposing regulation­s where labs would need to assign biosafety officers and apply for licences good for one to five years, depending on the pathogen.
AFP/GETTY IMAGES The federal government is proposing regulation­s where labs would need to assign biosafety officers and apply for licences good for one to five years, depending on the pathogen.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada