Montreal Gazette

Scientist slams federal sewage dump study

-

Environmen­t Canada’s panel charged with reviewing Montreal’s planned sewage dump is a sham, says a prominent scientist.

The federal department has the expertise and Environmen­t Canada scientists have done the work, said Sarah Dorner, an associate professor at École Polytechni­que and one of five signatorie­s of a position paper declaring the plan to dump billions of litres of sewage justified.

What’s important, says Dorner, is an evaluation on the impact on fish. “We’re talking about models — how these contaminan­ts will be spread out, will be dispersed through the environmen­t,” she said.

Dorner, who studies urban drainage and water quality and holds the Canada Research Chair in source water protection, and four colleagues from the École Polytechni­que released the paper because they said they were concerned about political interferen­ce.

“The appearance is that the minister basically created this expert panel to avoid making a decision,” she said.

Dorner said the members of the government panel are competent, but they should not be charged with the decision. The panel does not have the full range of necessary expertise and is not wholly independen­t, she said. One expert, INRS-Institut Armand-Frappier professor Daniel G. Cyr, has spoken out against the dump plan, while Robert Hausler of ÉTS has worked with the city on its ozonation plant, Dorner said. The third expert is Viviane Yargeau of McGill University.

Cyr said in an email the panel was to meet on Monday.

“There is no need for this because we have paid scientists on staff who are expected to do their work. These are top-notch researcher­s who have been studying the St. Lawrence for decades,” Dorner said, declining to name the scientists.

Asked about previous Environmen­t Canada studies, a spokesman wrote in an email that the panel “is taking into considerat­ion informatio­n from the city, the province, and other scientific and technical experts in this field to analyze the current proposal as well as other options available to the city.” Environmen­t Canada expects the report by Oct. 31.

On Sunday, federal Environmen­t Minister Leona Aglukkaq appointed three experts to assess Montreal’s plan, and to report back by Nov. 2. Mayor Denis Coderre has said the deadline for starting the dump is Oct. 23, after which the work might have to be put off for a year.

On Monday, an aide to the mayor said she had no informatio­n on whether the work might be able to go ahead this season after the report is handed down.

The city needs to build a snow chute while the Bonaventur­e Expressway is dismantled to make way for a ground-level boulevard. Eight billion litres of sewage would be run off to the river as a sewer would be closed to allow the work to proceed for seven days.

Dorner could not say whether the work could happen after the mayor’s deadline.

“There is critical maintenanc­e work that has to be conducted,” Dorner said, comparing a delay to what happens if you didn’t fill a tooth cavity in a timely manner.

“This way, they could co-ordinate their work to minimize the overall amount of sewage that would be dumped.”

Sylvain Ouellet, Projet Montréal’s spokesman on the environmen­t and water, said the party was pleased with panel’s appointmen­t.

He said the party was not necessaril­y against the sewage dump. However, no environmen­tal studies or options to mitigate the spill were provided, Ouellet said. Asked about Environmen­t Canada studies, as suggested by Dorner, he said: “This is the main problem with the dossier since the beginning. We don’t have access to data, we don’t have access to documentat­ion.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada