Montreal Gazette

U.S. plan aims to cut truck speed

- TOM KRISHER

DETROIT The U.S. is seeking to forcibly limit how fast trucks, buses and other large vehicles can travel on the nation’s highways.

A new proposal Friday would impose a nationwide limit by electronic­ally capping speeds with a device on newly made U.S. vehicles that weigh more than 26,000 pounds (or approximat­ely 11,800 kilograms). Regulators are considerin­g a cap of 60, 65 or 68 miles per hour (or approximat­ely 96, 105, 110 kilometres an hour), though that could change.

Whatever the speed limit, drivers would be physically prevented from exceeding it.

The government said capping speeds for large vehicles will reduce the 1,115 fatal crashes involving heavy trucks that occur each year and save US$1 billion in fuel costs.

The proposal from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administra­tion and Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administra­tion is subject to public comment before becoming final.

While the news is being welcomed by safety advocates and non-profession­al drivers, many truckers say that such changes could lead to dangerous scenarios where they are travelling at much lower speeds than everyone else.

The rule has been ensnared in a regulatory maze in the decade since the non-profit group Roadsafe America issued its first petition in 2006. The group was founded by Atlanta financial adviser Steve Owings and his wife Susan, whose son Cullum was killed by a speeding tractor-trailer during a trip back to school in Virginia after Thanksgivi­ng in 2002. The non-profit was later joined by the American Trucking Associatio­ns, the nation’s largest trucking industry group.

Owings said he’s happy that speed-limiting technology may be in place soon, but frustrated by how long it took.

“This glacial process, if you can call it a process, is not effective,” Owings said before the latest proposal arrived. “It’s easy to see why so many citizens are angry about the ineffectiv­eness of government.”

The government agencies involved will take public comment for 60 days, then determine the final limit and decide if the regulation should be put in place.

The agencies said the proposal is based on available safety data and the additional benefit of better fuel economy. The cost would be minimal because all of the 3.6 million big rigs on U.S. roads have speedlimit­ing devices installed already, but some don’t have the limits set, according to agency documents.

But Norita Taylor, spokeswoma­n for the 157,000-member Owner Operator Independen­t Drivers Associatio­n, said her group has opposed the speed limiters because they create dangerous interactio­ns between vehicles as faster cars slow down for trucks. “Differenti­als in speed increase interactio­ns between vehicles, which increases the likelihood of crashes,” Taylor said.

Yet there is another compelling reason to limit truck speeds. An investigat­ion last year by The Associated Press found that 14 states have speed limits for big trucks that are equal to or higher than their tires were designed to handle. Most truck tires aren’t designed to go faster than 75 mph (or 120 kph), and tire manufactur­ers say travelling faster than that can cause tires to fail and blow out, creating safety issues.

 ?? TED S. WARREN/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? A new federal regulation would impose the nationwide limit by electronic­ally capping speeds with a device on newly-made U.S. vehicles that weigh more than 26,000 pounds.
TED S. WARREN/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS A new federal regulation would impose the nationwide limit by electronic­ally capping speeds with a device on newly-made U.S. vehicles that weigh more than 26,000 pounds.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada