Montreal Gazette

KIMMEL’S NEW VOICE

Comedian taps into his pain

-

Jimmy Kimmel, reluctant firebrand and until recently the third person mentioned in any conversati­on about the crowded field of late-night talk show hosts, has neverthele­ss found and tentativel­y occupied the space that remains stubbornly vacant since the back-to-back retirement­s of David Letterman and Jon Stewart in 2015.

After an evolution process that turned late-night hosts into the U.S. moral conscience, Kimmel’s words are hitting viewers in a way that vaults over the many thousands of urgent words from pundits, columnists, journalist­s and others who talk about complicate­d issues for a living. Without saying anything new, Kimmel is saying everything right.

Leading with his heart instead of his cheesy grin, and letting the nation see a grown man care enough about something to cry, he has spoken movingly on his ABC show, Jimmy Kimmel Live!, about the potential cruelty contained in Republican proposals to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act.

And, in a 10-minute monologue Monday about the shooting massacre, he called out the National Rifle Associatio­n’s ability to prevent the sort of gun-control laws a majority of voters say they want.

Three times now, in a media landscape that tends to celebrate the know-it-all, Kimmel has shown an appealingl­y naive yet skeptical grace in his outrage. It’s less Howard Beale (the famously unhinged anchorman in the 1976 film Network) and more akin to Kimmel’s lifetime idol, Letterman, who perfected an everyman ability to say, Wait a minute, this isn’t right, and would, on occasion, deploy his sharpened stick to those in power.

“I’ve been reading comments from people who say, ‘This is terrible, but there’s nothing we can do about it,’ ” Kimmel said Monday. “But I disagree with that intensely. Because of course there’s (a) lot of things we can do about it. But we don’t, which is interestin­g. Because when someone with a beard attacks us, we tap phones, we invoke travel bans, we build walls, we take every possible precaution to make sure it doesn’t happen again.

But when an American buys a gun and kills other Americans, then there’s nothing we can do about that.”

He talked of victims and anguish, of brave first responders and how society lets itself become inured to mass shootings. But mostly he focused on policy and lawmakers, at one point showing a screen of faces of 56 senators who voted, not long after the 2016 shooting deaths of 49 people in an Orlando nightclub, against background checks for people looking to buy guns online, privately or at gun shows.

“White House press secretary Sarah (Huckabee) Sanders said this is not the time ... for political debate,” Kimmel said. “I don’t know, we have 59 innocent people dead, it wasn’t their time either, so I think now is the time for political debate.”

He followed that with a litany of facts and rationales that any gun-control advocate has long been talking about. But, as with his impassione­d pleas for affordable health care, Kimmel’s emotional delivery might reach and affect viewers in a way that other advocates and politician­s and survivors somehow haven’t.

There’s something about watching a celebrity like him encounter and process his own fresh rage on hot-button issues. His health-care monologues in May and September came about because his infant son needed open-heart surgeries, and Kimmel, insured and well able to cover the costs, realized that not everyone in the U.S. has access to comprehens­ive care — especially if a new law limits their access to good insurance. It was here that Kimmel got a firsthand taste of politics, being assured of one thing by a lawmaker, only to discover that it was an empty promise, followed by a sickening amount of spin.

“I hate talking about stuff like this,” he said. “I just want to laugh about things every night, but that (is) becoming increasing­ly difficult lately. It feels like someone has opened a window into hell.”

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Jimmy Kimmel
Jimmy Kimmel

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada