Montreal Gazette

Will voters be thinking about pit-bull ban on Nov. 5?

Leading up to municipal elections on Nov. 5, we look at influentia­l factors in the Montreal race. Today: animal issues

- RENÉ BRUEMMER WHERE THE PARTIES STAND rbruemmer@postmedia.com twitter.com/renebruemm­er

From a pit bull-type ban to an illfated attempt to pull calèche horses from the streets of Old Montreal to a contentiou­s “urban rodeo” in the Old Port, animal-related issues dominated Montreal headlines to an unpreceden­ted degree over the last four years.

The question now is whether those issues will come back to bite incumbent mayor Denis Coderre and his party in the coming elections.

Opposition councillor­s contend they will, because they forced potential voters who normally pay little attention to the humdrum of daily municipal affairs to take an interest in how their city is being governed, and many didn’t like what they saw.

“With its new animal rights bylaw, the city needlessly enraged pet owners and effectivel­y painted itself into a corner,” said councillor Marvin Rotrand of the Coalition Montréal party.

“Now a lot of people know who the mayor is, but for all the wrong reasons,” said Sterling Downey, animal-rights critic for opposition party Projet Montréal. “They jumped the gun and did everything fast, and created a bylaw that doesn’t make sense and doesn’t hold water in court.”

Many of the disgruntle­d are young, Downey noted, and anger over animal issues could incite them to vote, or influence others already intending to come out on election day, Nov. 5.

Anie Samson, the city’s executive committee member responsibl­e for animals and public security, did not respond to an interview request from the Montreal Gazette. Samson and Coderre have said their actions reflect the will of most residents, many of whom fear pit bulls, and were put into effect in the best interests of public security and animal welfare. The issue has been hijacked in part by a vocal animal-rights movement, they said.

“We chose people’s safety,” Coderre said when council voted in the new animal-control bylaw in September 2016, noting that the law allows people who already own pit bulls to keep their dogs.

Coderre raised the idea of a ban 10 days after Christiane Vadnais, 55, was killed by her neighbour’s dog in June 2016. A poll taken two weeks after the attack found 70 per cent favoured a ban. Support was bolstered by a police study that determined pit bull-type dogs were responsibl­e for 38 per cent of the 362 serious dog bites reported on Montreal territory during a 21-month period.

In August 2016, the city issued its proposed bylaw, which included a ban on acquiring new pit bull-type dogs. Owners of pit bull-type dogs were allowed to keep them, but under strict new regulation­s that require short leashes and muzzles. No one with a criminal record would be allowed to keep one.

The proposals spurred widespread objections from animalrigh­ts groups who said numerous jurisdicti­ons have abandoned breed-specific legislatio­n because it didn’t work, and the law would force the death of innocent dogs.

The bylaw came into effect on Oct. 3, 2016, but was promptly suspended when a Quebec Superior Court judge sided with the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals’ call for a temporary injunction, ruling the law was too vague in its definition of “pit bull-type dogs,” and caused unfair prejudice to certain dogs.

That decision was overturned in Quebec Appeals Court two months later, which ruled the court must err on the side of assuming bylaws were created to preserve public safety. It also ruled no pit bull-type dogs could be euthanized unless considered a danger, pending legal proceeding­s.

The SPCA has pledged to fight the bylaw in court.

“We feel the new bylaw really shows the Coderre administra­tion in total improvisat­ion mode, with an ill-thought-out strategy,” said Sophie Gaillard, lawyer for the Montreal SPCA’s investigat­ions department. “It definitely hurt them in the public’s eyes. What we’ve seen from them is just this stubbornne­ss, no matter what experts say.”

Dog laws are not the only animalbase­d legislatio­n the Coderre administra­tion has been accused of rushing.

In response to incidents of horses collapsing in the street or being hit by a car, the Coderre administra­tion declared in late May 2016, at the start of tourist season, that it would impose a one-year moratorium on horse-drawn carriages, in order to study the issue. Applauded by animal-rights groups, the move was blasted by calèche drivers who said it left them no time to prepare and would cost them their livelihood­s.

A Quebec Superior Court judge immediatel­y granted a temporary injunction of the city motion, and the administra­tion subsequent­ly dropped the moratorium.

In August 2016, the city adopted new rules limiting the 24 horses’ shifts to nine hours, ordering vet inspection­s twice annually and requiring horses be taken off the road if temperatur­es reached 28 C or higher. Animal-rights groups still want them banned, but Coderre argues calèches are part of Montreal’s signature and heritage, and can stay as long as the horses’ welfare is guaranteed.

Montreal also hosted an “urban rodeo” in the Old Port of Montreal as part of its 375th anniversar­y celebratio­ns.

Six hundred veterinari­ans and veterinary technician­s signed a letter asking the city to scrap the idea on the basis the event is cruel to animals, backed up by animal activists. The Coderre administra­tion responded that rodeos are popular with many in Quebec (the event drew 35,000 spectators over four days; the St-Tite rodeo 180 kilometres north of Montreal draws 600,000 spectators a year) and animal safety was monitored, but he later said the city would not repeat the rodeo in 2018.

Projet Montréal

The party is against breed-specific legislatio­n. It supports “a bylaw that will truly enhance public safety and reduce the number of bites, regardless of the breed or appearance of the dog.”

The party platform also calls for:

replacing calèche rides with activities free of cruelty to animals; prohibitin­g any promotiona­l or commercial event that causes physical or psychologi­cal suffering to an animal; increasing the number of dog runs so more areas are served; increasing the number of animals residents are allowed to have in their homes to promote adoptions and avoid killing of animals; providing support for animal sterilizat­ion, particular­ly for disadvanta­ged or homeless clients; prohibitin­g the opening of new pet stores and require existing pet stores to offer animals for adoption.

Équipe Denis Coderre

The party’s platform makes no mention of animal issues.

The party created the city’s new animal control bylaw in September 2016, which instituted a ban on bringing new “pit bull-type” dogs into the city, and imposes regulation­s on owners of current dogs, including leashes no longer than 1.5 metres and muzzles at all times outdoors, as well as a $150 registrati­on fee compared with $25 for a “regular” dog.

 ?? SIMON MARCEAU-PELLETIER/THE CANADIAN PRESS ?? In the spring of 2016, Denis Coderre’s administra­tion proposed a one-year moratorium on using horses to pull calèches, but it was dropped following a court injunction.
SIMON MARCEAU-PELLETIER/THE CANADIAN PRESS In the spring of 2016, Denis Coderre’s administra­tion proposed a one-year moratorium on using horses to pull calèches, but it was dropped following a court injunction.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada