Montreal Gazette

UNIONS PUT ASIDE TIME LIMITS ON NEGOTIATIN­G FOR TIME BEING

- lgyulai@postmedia.com twitter.com/ CityHallRe­port

The city and the union representi­ng Montreal firefighte­rs only started collective bargaining in mid-March, but they’ve technicall­y already blown the negotiatin­g deadline imposed on them by a new Quebec law.

Law 24 was passed by the National Assembly in November 2016 to govern the process of negotiatin­g collective agreements in the municipal sector.

The legislatio­n got the support of a number of mayors, such as thenMontre­al mayor Denis Coderre, but was panned by the unions, which called it an unnecessar­y bludgeon.

Among other things, the law introduces time limits on negotiatio­n before the province intervenes and imposes mediation and binding arbitratio­n.

But the law doesn’t provide for exceptions to those time delays — such as a pause in negotiatio­n because of an election and a transition at city hall.

“It’s completely impractica­l,” said Chris Ross, the newly elected president of the Associatio­n des pompiers de Montréal.

The legislatio­n also changes the mediation and arbitratio­n process and introduces conditions that have to weigh into in a contract settlement, such as a municipali­ty’s fiscal situation.

Under Law 24, a municipali­ty and a police or firefighte­r union have 90 days before the expiry of a collective agreement plus 150 days following the expiry — for a total of 240 days — to negotiate a new contract.

If there’s no settlement in that time, the province names a mediator, who gets 60 days — renewable once — to reach a deal. After that, a provincial­ly appointed dispute settlement board may be called in.

In the case of a union other than the police or firefighte­rs, the law sets a 150-day limit on negotiatio­ns, with the possibilit­y of a 30-day extension.

The collective agreement of Montreal’s 2,371 firefighte­rs expired on Dec. 31, 2017, which means the two sides had until the end of May to negotiate a contract.

However, the city was in the throes of an election campaign when the negotiatin­g period opened in October. After that, the newly elected administra­tion of Mayor Valérie Plante was transition­ing into office.

The employer side asked for the first bargaining session to be in midMarch, Ross said.

“The city of Montreal, for reasons that are totally logical and understand­able, wasn’t prepared to sit down and negotiate until they completed that transition,” he said. “Well, if you applied strictly the law and the 240 days, we wouldn’t have had any time to negotiate at all.”

The city and the union say they intend to negotiate despite the law.

“The discussion­s are continuing,” city spokespers­on Gabrielle Fontaine-Giroux said in an email. “The parties wish to arrive at an agreement negotiated between themselves.”

A spokespers­on for the Municipal Affairs Department said the provisions of Law 24 aren’t optional. However, the department didn’t respond when asked if the government plans to enforce the law.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada