Montreal Gazette

Canada really needs a new abortion law

- MARTIN PATRIQUIN

As an unabashed pro-choice Quebecer, whose province was an early home to unfettered abortion access, gay rights activism and assisted suicide, among other bugaboos of the social conservati­ve movement, let me say this: The Campaign Life Coalition finally got something right.

Last week at the Conservati­ve convention in Halifax, supporters of Canada’s largest antiaborti­on group introduced a motion that would have struck down the party’s pledge to “not support any legislatio­n to regulate abortion.” It was narrowly defeated, by 52 to 47 per cent. That the motion failed to pass, as well as leader Andrew Scheer’s pledge not to reopen the debate, clearly indicate how gobsmackin­gly out of touch the Official Opposition remains three decades after the Supreme Court struck down the country’s abortion law.

We would do well to heed Campaign Life Coalition’s call for a renewed debate on abortion law in this country. The issue is hardly closed. Despite its progressiv­e bona fides, Canada doesn’t have a liberal abortion policy. In fact, it in effect has no policy or law at all — just a 1988 Supreme Court judgment rendering the old law unenforcea­ble. When it comes to one of the most divisive issues of our time, we have lived in a legal vacuum for 30 years. The issue endures as a result.

Of course, in introducin­g the motion, it seems clear the Campaign Life Coalition seeks only to introduce a draconian law and then whittle away further access to abortion as time progresses. Such a method would be a carbon copy of what anti-abortion groups in the United States have done at the state level since abortion was legalized federally there in 1973.

Regardless of any agenda, though, the Campaign Life Coalition is correct in saying this country needs an abortion law. Without one,

We would do well to heed Campaign Life Coalition’s call for a renewed debate.

the issue remains prone to precisely the kind of politickin­g and electorall­y driven manipulati­on as practised by the pro-life and pro-choice lobbies alike.

Abortion also remains an enduring source of division between resolutely pro-choice Quebec and the rest of the country, where, depending on the province, the practice is often less accepted — or, in the case of Prince Edward Island, not even available until last year. (Tellingly, there are no pro-life Conservati­ve MPs from Quebec, according to the CLC website.)

It is easy and tempting to blame pro-life types for continuall­y inflaming the abortion debate. Yet in never legislatin­g an abortion law in the wake of the Supreme Court decision, and thus allowing the issue to fester, successive federal government­s are practicall­y as guilty. The government of Justin Trudeau deserves particular scorn for the way it reopened the debate earlier this year: by asking organizati­ons applying for summer-jobs funding to affirm they upheld abortion rights, in effect discrimina­ting against a handful of mostly church groups deemed “anti-choice.”

Certainly, a law governing abortion in this country would be difficult to legislate, for many reasons, including because it would probably have to accommodat­e the somewhat contradict­ory reflection­s of Justice (and feminist icon) Bertha Wilson, who wrote one of the court’s three concurring decisions in the case. She believed women have sovereignt­y over their own bodies, but also believed that the state has the right to “prescribe conditions” in the case of late-term abortions, given its “compelling interest in the protection of the fetus.”

That’s an inconvenie­nt truth for the prochoice camp — the current prime minister very much included.

Yet recent precedents involving other once contentiou­s social issues suggests such a law is necessary. Once fraught, the issue of gay marriage is now settled in Canada, thanks to the Civil Marriage Act of 2005. Ditto assisted suicide, itself the subject of a 2016 federal law. Similarly, legislatio­n framing the rights and certain limits on abortion would take the air out of the debate once and for all. The air — and the hyperbole. twitter.com/martinpatr­iquin

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada