Montreal Gazette

AMMONIA EMISSIONS CAN BE DANGEROUS

Gas combining with sulphuric acid in air can cause health problems

- JOE SCHWARCZ joe.schwarcz@mcgill.ca Joe Schwarcz is director of McGill University’s Office for Science & Society (mcgill.ca/oss). He hosts The Dr. Joe Show on CJAD Radio 800 AM every Sunday from 3 to 4 p.m.

Once you have sniffed ammonia, you are not likely to forget its penetratin­g odour. Just ask the paramedics who responded to an emergency call from a home in Virginia: they were almost overcome by the powerful smell of the gas. They quickly transporte­d the occupant, who was in respirator­y distress, to hospital and alerted the Sheriff ’s Department about the overpoweri­ng odour. Deputies wearing protective suits and breathing equipment found 40 chickens, three dogs and a cat occupying the premises. The homeowner who had been overcome by the ammonia fumes managed to recover, only to be charged with three counts of inadequate care of a companion animal and two counts of inadequate care of an agricultur­al animal. His residence was condemned by the fire marshal. Mammals, like dogs and cats, eliminate extra nitrogen from their bodies by incorporat­ing it into urea, a water-soluble compound that is excreted in the urine. Poultry and birds have a different mechanism for nitrogen disposal, eliminatin­g excess in the form of uric acid instead of urea. Since birds don’t have different orifices for eliminatin­g urine and feces, both are expelled together. Uric acid is not very soluble and its white crystals dominate the colour of bird poop. Both urea and uric acid break down to release ammonia when acted upon by urease, an enzyme produced by various bacteria that are found in fecal matter as well as in the soil. This makes animal output a source of ammonia gas, a significan­t air pollutant. When animals are kept indoors without adequate air circulatio­n, ammonia can build up to toxic levels, as the Virginia victim discovered. In commercial barns and poultry houses, the gas can have a negative impact on animal health and can irritate the lungs of workers. Outdoors, volatilize­d ammonia can travel hundreds of miles from animal-production facilities and cause problems. It combines with traces of sulphuric acid in the air to form tiny particles of ammonium sulphate that can penetrate deep into the lungs, exacerbati­ng respirator­y and cardiovasc­ular disease. The particles also cause haze and a reduction in visibility. Where does the sulphuric acid come from? It forms when sunlight promotes the reaction of sulphur dioxide, produced by burning sulphur-containing fossil fuels, with moisture in the air. There are still further problems. Ammonia in the air can dissolve in surface waters, fertilizin­g the growth of algae. When these die, they decompose via a process that uses up oxygen in the water, leading to the decline of fish population­s. Obviously, any measure that can lessen ammonia emissions is welcome. A novel approach is to reduce the amount of nitrogen that cattle eliminate by increasing the proportion of the feed that the animal can incorporat­e into its body mass. The Food and Drug Administra­tion in the U.S. has recently approved a cattle feed additive that accomplish­es this. “Lubabegron” was initially studied for potential applicatio­ns in human health, particular­ly in the treatment of diabetes. However, along the way, researcher­s discovered that it improved the assimilati­on of food, giving rise to the idea of incorporat­ing it into animal feed. Just how much of an impact it will have on ammonia emissions isn’t clear from the small-scale studies that have been carried out, but no adverse effects on the animals’ health or on the meat they yield have been noted. Ammonia pollution is just another complicati­on of our reliance on eating meat. But don’t think that if we eat only plant foods, we solve the problem. True, plants don’t poop, but they do require fertilizer. That fertilizer is often urea, which can release ammonia when it comes into contact with soil microbes that are equipped with urease. That’s why there is research into chemicals called urease inhibitors that can prevent the release of ammonia from urea. The applicatio­n of urea combined with N-(n-butyl)thiophosph­oric triamide (NBTPT), the most widely used urease inhibitor, can reduce ammonia loss by up to 90 per cent when compared with untreated urea. This also results in a boost in crop yield, since the nitrogen that is not lost as ammonia helps fulfil the nutrient demand of the crop. Not all ammonia emissions are unwelcome. Helicobact­er pylori, the bacteria that can cause ulcers, are equipped with urease. To diagnose whether the bacteria are present in the digestive tract, a biopsy specimen is removed during gastroscop­y and is placed into a medium containing urea and an indicator such as phenol red. If the bacteria are present, the urease they produce converts urea to ammonia, raising the pH of the medium and causing the indicator to change from yellow to red. Antibiotic­s can then be used to treat the problem. Finally, you will sometimes see hockey players break open a little ampoule and sniff its contents. They are hoping that a jolt of ammonia will give them a temporary boost in alertness that translates to better performanc­e. And it’s perfectly legal.

 ?? MARCIO JOSE SANCHEz/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILES ?? When animals are kept indoors without adequate air circulatio­n, ammonia can build up to toxic levels, writes Joe Schwarcz. In commercial barns and poultry houses, the gas can have a negative impact on animal health and can irritate the lungs of workers.
MARCIO JOSE SANCHEz/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILES When animals are kept indoors without adequate air circulatio­n, ammonia can build up to toxic levels, writes Joe Schwarcz. In commercial barns and poultry houses, the gas can have a negative impact on animal health and can irritate the lungs of workers.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada