National Post

Yamana shareholde­rs reject pay package

- By Peter Koven Financial Post pkoven@nationalpo­st.com Twitter.com/peterkoven

• Shareholde­rs have voted against a gold miner’s lofty pay package for the second straight day, delivering a resolute message that compensati­on needs to better reflect stock performanc­e.

Yamana Gold Inc.’ s “say on pay” resolution got a firm rejection at the company’s annual meeting on Wednesday, with 63 per cent of votes cast against it. Chairman and chief executive Peter Marrone said he regrets the result, which is non-binding, and will work with shareholde­rs on linking compensati­on more closely with the share price.

“That share price does matter. We’re sensitive to it and we need to be sensitive in our compensati­on construct,” he said in an interview following the meeting in Toronto.

What’s more, Marrone saw that shareholde­rs were unhappy and decided to cancel 450,000 performanc­e share units that were granted to him last year following the Osisko Mining Corp. transactio­n. “I hope that will be seen as a positive sign,” he said.

Yamana’s proxy circular states that Marrone’s total compensati­on was US$5.8 million in 2014, down 45 per cent from the prior year. But after adding in a “special cash bonus” for completing an acquisitio­n and other awards, his overall pay was a whopping US$11.3 million, according to Glass Lewis & Co. It was a less rewarding year for investors, as Yamana shares plunged 49 per cent in 2014.

The Yamana vote came just a day after a Barrick Gold Corp.’s “say on pay” resolution also received a resounding “No” from investors. Only a quarter of shareholde­r votes backed that compensati­on plan.

After the meeting, Marrone said he thought the result of the Yamana vote would be similar to Barrick’s. But several of the company’s largest shareholde­rs ended up voting in Yamana’s favour, bringing support up to the 37 per cent level.

He also said there are “lots of precedents” to the US$2.7 million bonus he got for the partial acquisitio­n of Osisko Mining Corp., and that this deal was the culminatio­n of a much longer effort to build a presence in Canada.

The results of the Yamana and Barrick “say on pay” votes were not a surprise, as both Glass Lewis and Institutio­nal Shareholde­r services urged clients to vote “No.” Glass Lewis is also urging investors to vote against the compensati­on plans at Goldcorp Inc. and Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.

Those companies hold their annual meetings on Thursday and Friday, respective­ly.

While Yamana had a brutal year from a share-price viewpoint in 2014, Marrone argued that it was successful in other ways. In addition to the Osisko takeover (done jointly with Agnico Eagle), he noted that the company streamline­d management, performed well in its core operations, and hived off non-core assets into a new subsidiary with a separate management team.

The Osisko deal gave Yamana its first mining properties in Canada, including the prized Canadian Malartic gold mine. Last week, the company took another step to boost its Canadian business by striking a $17.5 million deal to buy Mega Precious Metals Inc.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada