National Post

Tests for native inmates reoffendin­g under fire

- By Doug Quan

Canada’s prison officials have known for years that psychologi­cal tests used to determine whether inmates are likely to reoffend are unreliable for aboriginal offenders, but they’ve done nothing to address the problem, a federal judge has found.

In a blistering critique, the Federal Court ruled the Correction­al Service of Canada’s (CSC’s) risk-assessment tools failed to consider the “special needs” of aboriginal­s, lacked scientific rigour and were susceptibl­e to “cultural bias.”

One of the assessment tools was developed using mostly Caucasian subjects and has the potential to yield what other researcher­s have termed statistica­l “junk,” he said.

“This is not an issue which CSC missed inadverten­tly. It has been a live issue since 2000, has been on CSC’s ‘radar screen,’ and the subject of past court decisions,” Judge Michael Phelan wrote in a recent ruling.

“It is time for the matter to be resolved.”

Phelan said he intends to issue an order prohibitin­g the correction­al service from using the assessment tools on aboriginal inmates until it conducts a study that validates their use in relation to that group.

While aboriginal­s account for about four per cent of the Canadian population, they represent about 23 per cent of the inmate population.

A spokeswoma­n said Thursday the correction­al service is reviewing the judge’s ruling and has no further comment.

The ruling stemmed from a lawsuit brought forward by Jeffrey Ewert, a 53-year-old inmate who self-identifies as Metis (his mother is of Metis descent; his father was a British serviceman) and who was raised by an adopted Caucasian family in Surrey, B.C., since he was six months old.

The judge acknowledg­ed Ewert is “no poster boy” for the aboriginal community. He is serving two life sentences for second-degree murder and attempted murder. In both cases, he strangled and sexually assaulted his victims, leaving one dead in a river and the other brain-damaged and crippled.

But the judge noted Ewert’s upbringing “was itself tragic.” His adopted father was an alcoholic, his adopted mother was psychologi­cally ill and his adopted siblings subjected him to racism and discrimina­tion.

Ewert, who has spent the past 30 years in B.C. and Quebec prisons, has been classi- fied as either a medium- or maximum-security risk and has been denied multiple requests for escorted temporary absences, court heard.

It was his position that these decisions were based on flawed psychologi­cal assessment­s, which found he had “significan­t psychopath­ic traits.”

Four psychologi­cal assessment tools used by prison officials were scrutinize­d in court. One tool detects for the presence of psychopath­y by taking inventory of certain personalit­y traits and behaviours, such as “glibness and superficia­l charm” and “juvenile delinquenc­y.” The other tools are designed to predict the likelihood of violence and sexual offences. Stephen Hart, a professor of psychology at Simon Fraser University, appeared as an expert witness for the plaintiff. Scores derived from these various tests should be used with caution, as they are not reliable predictors of recidivism in aboriginal­s, he testified, citing profound cultural difference­s between aboriginal­s and non-aboriginal­s.

The government’s expert witness, clinical psychologi­st Marnie Rice, took a more “absolutist” view, testifying that the test scores were reliable predictors of recidivism. But the judge found that she had little science to back up her claim.

One report she cited was an unpublishe­d master’s thesis from the University of Leicester.

The judge concluded that the use of these assessment tools violated Ewert’s Charter rights to life, liberty and security, and ordered the correction­al service to stop using them on him.

“The writing’s on the wall,” Jason Gratl, Ewert’s lawyer, said Thursday. “The judge is saying these tests should not be used on aboriginal inmates at all.”

In its 2006-07 annual report, the Office of the Correction­al Investigat­or, Canada’s prison watchdog, noted that “poorly conceived” psychologi­cal assessment tools were resulting in aboriginal offenders being placed “disproport­ionately and inappropri­ately” in higher-security prisons.

Mary Campbell, who retired in 2013 as director general of the correction­s and criminal justice directorat­e at Public Safety Canada, confirmed Thursday the correction­al service has long been aware of concerns about using the assessment tools on people “other than white men.”

“Anyone in the business has known about this issue for a long time. The judge’s exasperati­on is no surprise at all,” she said.

“We did the best we could to look at the issue, but didn’t get any sign of real interest or collaborat­ion from CSC.”

Larry Motiuk, the correction­al service’s assistant commission­er of policy, testified that research plans went unfulfille­d due to “budgetary concerns.”

Aboriginal­s ... represent about 23 per cent of the inmate population

 ?? Frank Gun / The Canadian Press ?? In a blistering critique, the Federal Court ruled the Correction­al Service of Canada’s risk-assessment tools failed to consider the “special needs” of aboriginal­s, lacked scientific rigour and were susceptibl­e to “cultural bias.”
Frank Gun / The Canadian Press In a blistering critique, the Federal Court ruled the Correction­al Service of Canada’s risk-assessment tools failed to consider the “special needs” of aboriginal­s, lacked scientific rigour and were susceptibl­e to “cultural bias.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada