National Post

Major League Baseball still not interested in welcoming Pete Rose back into the family.

Career hits leader ‘ lied right in the commission­er’s office’

- By Joe Kay and Ronald Blum

CINCINNATI• Pete Rose’s applicatio­n for reinstatem­ent to baseball was rejected Monday by commission­er Rob Manfred, who concluded the career hits leader continued to gamble even while trying to end his lifetime ban and would be a risk to the sport’s integrity if allowed back in the game.

Rose agreed to the ban in August 1989 after an investigat­ion for Major League Baseball by lawyer John Dowd found Rose placed numerous bets on the Cincinnati Reds to win from 1985- 87 while playing for and managing the team.

In one of his first major actions, Manfred said in a four-page decision the career hits leader admitted he has kept on betting legally on horse racing and profession­al sports, including baseball. Manfred upheld the conclusion­s of the Dowd report and said MLB obtained additional evidence not available to Dowd: a notebook of betting records from 1986 kept by Rose associate Michael Bertolini.

“In short, Mr. Rose has not presented credible evidence of a reconfigur­ed life either by an honest acceptance by him of his wrongdoing, so clearly establishe­d in the Dowd report, or by a rigorous, self- aware and sustained program of avoidance by him of all the circumstan­ces that led to his permanent ineligibil­ity in 1989,” Manfred wrote.

Manfred also said Rose has never “seriously sought treatment” for attention deficit hyperactiv­ity disorder and opposition­al defiant behaviour, conditions he said in his 2004 book had afflicted him.

“Mr. Rose’s public and private comments, including his initial admission in 2004, provide me with little confidence that he has a mature understand­ing of his wrongful conduct, that he has accepted full responsibi­lity for it, or that he understand­s the damage he has caused,” Manfred wrote. “I am also not convinced that he has avoided the type of conduct and associatio­ns that originally led to his placement on the permanentl­y ineligible list.”

Rose’s lawyers said he will comment on the decision at a news conference Tuesday.

“While we may have failed at our task of presenting all of the facts to the commission­er demonstrat­ing how Pete has grown and changed over the past three decades, Pete has meaningful­ly reconfigur­ed his life,” Rose’s lawyers, Ray Genco and Mark Rosenbaum, said in a statement.

“Pete’s fall from grace is without parallel, but he recognizes that it was also of his own making,” they said. “As such, Pete seeks to be judged not just by the mistakes of his past, but also by the work he has done over the last three decades to take responsibi­lity for his actions.”

Manfred said when he met with the 74- year- old Rose, the 17-time all-star at first was not forthcomin­g about his current gambling.

“Rose initially denied betting on baseball currently and only later in the interview did he ‘clarify’ his response to admit such betting,” Manfred wrote.

Rose’s conduct violated Major League Rule 21, which calls for a lifetime ban for betting on any game “with which the bettor has a duty to perform.”

“Allowing him to work in the game presents unacceptab­le risk of a future violation by him of Rule 21, and thus to the integrity of our sport,” Manfred wrote.

The ban prevents Rose f rom working for any major league team or minor league affiliate, but he is allowed to make ceremonial appearance­s with the commission­er’s permission and may work for third parties such as Fox, which hired Rose this year as a baseball analyst.

Players on the permanentl­y ineligible list also may not appear on the Hall of Fame ballot, a decision taken by the Hall’s board in 1991. Reds president Bob Castellini said he hopes the hall will reconsider its decision.

“We and the fans think he deserves that opportunit­y,” he said.

At the time the ban agreement was announced, then- commission­er A. Bartlett Giamatti said: “The burden is entirely on Mr. Rose to reconfigur­e his life in a way he deems appropriat­e.”

Rose applied for reinstatem­ent in September 1997 and met with commission­er Bud Selig in November 2002, but Selig never ruled on Rose’s applicatio­n. Manfred succeeded Selig in January, and Rose applied again on Feb. 26 to end the ban. He met with Manfred on Sept. 24.

“It was great opinion,” Dowd said. “I’m proud of the commission­er for protecting the integrity of the game.”

Manfred called former commission­er Fay Vincent on Monday to inform him of the decision. Vincent was Giamatti’s deputy and hired Dowd, then became commission­er following Giamatti’s death on Sept. 1, 1989.

“I think he is a tragic figure,” Vincent said. “He believed he was a great ballplayer, that he could do anything he wanted and that baseball would never have the guts to throw him out.”

Vincent called Rose’s initial denial of current gambling “bizarre.”

“He lied about betting on baseball right in the commission­er’s office,” Dowd said.

Rose repeatedly denied betting on baseball until his 2004 autobiogra­phy, Pete Rose: My Prison Without Bars. He reversed his stand and acknowledg­ed he bet on the Reds while managing Cincinnati. Manfred said that while Rose admitted to him betting on Reds games in 1987, he didn’t remember facts establishe­d by the Dowd report showing he bet on baseball in 1985 and 1986 as a player.

Rose submitted two reports to Manfred, one by Dr. Timothy Fong, co- director of the UCLA Gambling Studies Program and director of the UCLA Addiction Psychiatry Fellowship. Manfred said he gave the report little weight because it was inconsiste­nt with what Rose told him.

The second report was a polygraph test taken on Aug. 5 by a consultant retained by Rose’s representa­tives. Manfred wrote the polygraph test concluded “no opinion” based on technical reasons that were not Rose’s responsibi­lity. Rose was the 1963 NL Rookie of the Year, 1973 MVP and 1975 World Series MVP. A threetime NL batting champion, he had 4,256 hits f rom 1963- 86, topping the mark of 4,191 set by Ty Cobb from 1905-28.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Pete Rose
Pete Rose
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada