National Post

Change should be ordained at home

- Barry Critchley

Steve Pinkus is a selfemploy­ed management consultant who, over the years, has been part of the “cleanup crew” on numerous change assignment­s for private and public enterprise­s.

Author can now be added to his list of skills. His book, titled Big Change, defines itself as a 10- step plan to affect large organizati­onal transforma­tions from the inside.

Pinkus wrote it with the plea that all executives read “this book so that they don’t make the mistake of abdicating their leadership of a critical transforma­tion to an external team. Organizati­ons need to lead their own change. Instead they are farming it out to external groups.”

That theme is a constant throughout the 212- page book: Consultant­s can be useful in getting the right solution, particular­ly on the big picture stuff because “they have done it globally.”

But the same consultant­s aren’t so good when it comes to implementa­tion. “You need to f i gure out how to do a lot of the work yourself,” said Pinkus, who has both the academic credential­s, ( an MBA) and decades of practical experience ( as an employee at l arge companies, at a large con- sultancy firm and as a self employed “worker in the trenches.”) “The consultanc­y firms don’t know how to get it done,” he added.

The Pinkus view takes place against the backdrop of a sustained increase in the pace of change, an increase brought about by global competitio­n, t he fallout from mergers and acquisitio­ns, organizati­ons’ need to change strategy, and the effects of technology — the new major area of the work by Pinkus.

“With a major technology change, the biggest change-piece is not the technology but the process change, a larger change than simply learning a new applicatio­n,” he said.

Pinkus, whose views are consistent with those of John Kotter, a Harvard Business School professor, is clear on another point, the link between transforma­tional change and management skills. “It needs to be a core competency of the senior management team, of knowing how to do this. It never used to be because 15 years back you would hire ( a consultant) and ( those ideas) would be good for five years,” he said.

While the book devotes 10 chapters to leading large transforma­tional change, Pinkus was asked for his top three ideas. Here is his list: ❚ Getting “t r ue” understand­ing, commitment and support at the executive level. “Getting the leaders to agree is not enough. They need understand­ing, agree- ment and support. They, the chief executive and other C- level folks, have to be involved,” he said, noting, that the reason, “about half the projects go wrong are because the C- suite is not behind it.” ❚ Assembling a team, rather than using the project management group. “For a transforma­tion you are picking a person or a team that i s going to make or break t he organizati­on. They better be the right people, t hat know your business and make the right decisions,” said Pinkus. ❚ The need f or an “early and extensive” project and change plan. How extensive? Pinkus argues the plan should run from when “the decision i s made to well beyond the time the plan is implemente­d,” and should include the communicat­ion, the training, “and the nuts and bolts of what has to be done.” In his business, Pinkus focuses on the nuts and bolts. Indeed he argues that a real key is “sustaining” the change. “It’s not over when it’s live,” declares Pinkus.

ORGANIZATI­ONS NEED TO LEAD THEIR OWN CHANGE.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada